ReviewDrug safety2015
ADR Reporting by the General Public: Lessons Learnt from the Dutch and Swedish Systems.
Review in Drug safety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The value of patient reporting to the pharmacovigilance system: a systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Pooled it
- Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Using a Mobile Device Application by Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug safety · 2021Trial
- Ecopharmacovigilance and pharmacovigilance: an analysis of environment-related reporting in VigiBase.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Pregnant Women and Vaccine Safety in Uganda: Knowledge, Barriers, and Opportunities for Engagement.Vaccines · 2025Article
- An analysis of awareness and acceptability of the Medicines Side Effect Reporting Form for Consumer and the quality of data entered by consumers - An Indian perspective.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Factors associated with the completeness of information provided in adverse drug reaction reports of physicians, pharmacists and consumers from Germany.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Awareness and Attitudes Regarding Adverse Drug Events and Reporting in South Africa.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Self-reporting of adverse drug reactions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in community pharmacies.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Burden of Drug-Induced Impulsivity: A Network Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.Drug safety · 2024Article
- Misuse, Abuse and Medication Errors' Adverse Events Associated with Opioids-A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Sociodemographic Characteristics of Adverse Event Reporting in the USA: An Ecologic Study.Drug safety · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Information Provided in German Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Sent by Physicians, Pharmacists and Consumers.Drug safety · 2023Article
- Strategies and interventions to strengthen pharmacovigilance systems in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting among the General Public in Lithuania: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Comparison of Patient Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems in Nine Selected Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- A cross-sectional study: comparison of public perceptions of adverse drug reaction reporting and monitoring in eastern and western China.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- The Importance of Direct Patient Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in the Safety Monitoring Process.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Pharmacovigilance Data as a Trigger to Identify Antimicrobial Resistance and Inappropriate Use of Antibiotics: A Study Using Reports from The Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Qualitative Study of General Public Views towards Adverse Drug Reactions in Lithuania.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consumer reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has existed in several countries for decades, but throughout Europe the role of consumers as a source of information on ADRs has not been fully accepted until recently. In Europe, The Netherlands and Sweden were among the first countries to implement consumer reporting well before it was mandated by law throughout the EU. Consumer reporting is an integral part of the spontaneous reporting systems in both The Netherlands and Sweden, with yearly numbers of reports constantly increasing. Consumer reporting forms and handling procedures are essentially the same as for healthcare professional reporting; the message in the reports, not the type of messenger, is what is of importance. Studies have established the significant contribution of consumer reporting to ADR signal detection. Combining all reports regardless of reporter type is recommended since it yields the largest critical mass of reports for signal detection. Examples of signals where consumer reports have been of crucial importance for signal detection are electric shock-like sensations associated with the use of duloxetine, and persistent sexual dysfunction after discontinuation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. An example of consumer reporting significantly strengthening a detected signal is Pandemrix(®) (influenza H1N1 vaccine)-induced narcolepsy. Raising public awareness of ADR reporting is important, but time- and resource-consuming. The minimum effort taken should be to passively inform consumers, e.g. via stakeholders' homepages and via drug product information leaflets. Another possibility of reaching out to this target group could be through co-operation with other (non-government) organizations. Information from consumer reports may give a new perspective on ADRs via the consumers' unfiltered experiences. Consumers' views may change the way the benefit-harm balance of drugs is perceived and assessed today, and, being the ultimate users of drugs, consumers could have a relevant influence in the regulatory decision-making processes for drugs. All stakeholders in pharmacovigilance should embrace this new valuable source of information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25627832What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.