Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25627812›Full record

ArticleMucosal immunology2015

Immune requirements for protective Th17 recall responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge.

L Monin, K L Griffiths, S Slight, Y Lin, J Rangel-Moreno, S A Khader

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mucosal immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Novel Multistage SubunitVaccines · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L Monin1] Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA [2] Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
K L GriffithsDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
S SlightDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Y LinDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Rangel-MorenoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
S A Khader1] Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA [2] Department of Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Universiity of Rochester Center for Medical Countermeasures against RadiationU19AI091036 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CHEN, YUHCHYAU · 2010 to 2014
$15.6M
ROLE OF IL-17 IN PROTECTIVE VACCINE-INDUCED IMMUNE RESPONSES AGAINST TUBERCULOSISR01HL105427 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI KHADER, SHABAANA A. · 2011 to 2025
$5.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL105427NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105427NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI091036NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI91036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) vaccine development has focused largely on targeting T helper type 1 (Th1) cells. However, despite inducing Th1 cells, the recombinant TB vaccine MVA85A failed to enhance protection against TB disease in humans. In recent years, Th17 cells have emerged as key players in vaccine-induced protection against TB. However, the exact cytokine and immune requirements that enable Th17-induced recall protection remain unclear. In this study, we have investigated the requirements for Th17 cell-induced recall protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) challenge by utilizing a tractable adoptive transfer model in mice. We demonstrate that adoptive transfer of Mtb-specific Th17 cells into naive hosts, and upon Mtb challenge, results in Th17 recall responses that confer protection at levels similar to vaccination strategies. Importantly, although interleukin (IL)-23 is critical, IL-12 and IL-21 are dispensable for protective Th17 recall responses. Unexpectedly, we demonstrate that interferon-γ (IFN-γ) produced by adoptively transferred Th17 cells impairs long-lasting protective recall immunity against Mtb challenge. In contrast, CXCR5 expression is crucial for localization of Th17 cells near macrophages within well-formed B-cell follicles to mediate Mtb control. Thus, our data identify new immune characteristics that can be harnessed to improve Th17 recall responses for enhancing vaccine design against TB.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansInterleukinsMiceMice, KnockoutMycobacterium tuberculosisTh17 CellsTh1 CellsTuberculosisTuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNAInterleukinsMVA 85ATuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID25627812
PMCPMC4517980
OpenAlexW1978845635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.