Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25627758›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2015

Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization using sponges.

Chang-Seop Lee, Bianca Montalmont, Jessica A O'Hara, Alveena Syed, Charma Chaussard, Traci L McGaha, Diana L Pakstis, Ju-Hyung Lee, Kathleen A Shutt, Yohei Doi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prevalence of methicillin-resistantInfection prevention in practice · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chang-Seop Lee1Division of Infectious Diseases,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Bianca Montalmont1Division of Infectious Diseases,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Jessica A O'Hara1Division of Infectious Diseases,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Alveena Syed1Division of Infectious Diseases,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Charma Chaussard1Division of Infectious Diseases,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Traci L McGaha1Division of Infectious Diseases,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Diana L Pakstis1Division of Infectious Diseases,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Ju-Hyung Lee3Department of Prevent Medicine,Chonbuk National University Medical School,Jeonju,Republic of Korea.
Kathleen A Shutt1Division of Infectious Diseases,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
Yohei Doi1Division of Infectious Diseases,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · USJeonbuk National University · KR

Funding

Colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumanniiR01AI104895 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DOI, YOHEI, ERNST, ROBERT K · 2014 to 2024
$4.2M
Markers predicting response to therapy for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniaeR21AI107302 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DOI, YOHEI · 2013 to 2014
$409k
Optimizing Detection of MRSA CarriageR03HS021521 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DOI, YOHEI · 2012 to 2013
$99k
AHRQ HHS R03 HS021521AHRQ HHS R03HS021521NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI104895NIAID NIH HHS R01AI104895NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI107302NIAID NIH HHS R21AI107302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Nasal swab culture is the standard method for identifying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers. However, this method is known to miss a substantial portion of those carrying MRSA elsewhere. We hypothesized that the additional use of a sponge to collect skin culture samples would significantly improve the sensitivity of MRSA detection. DESIGN Hospitalized patients with recent MRSA infection were enrolled and underwent MRSA screening of the forehead, nostrils, pharynx, axilla, and groin with separate swabs and the forehead, axilla, and groin with separate sponges. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing was conducted by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PATIENTS A total of 105 MRSA patients were included in the study. RESULTS At least 1 specimen from 56.2% of the patients grew MRSA. Among patients with at least 1 positive specimen, the detection sensitivities were 79.7% for the swabs and 64.4% for the sponges. Notably, 86.4% were detected by a combination of sponges and nasal swab, and 72.9% were detected by a combination of pharyngeal and nasal swabs, whereas only 50.9% were detected by nasal swab alone (P<0.0001 and P=0.0003, respectively). Most isolates had SCCmec type II (59.9%) and IV (35.7%). No correlation was observed between the SCCmec types and collection sites. CONCLUSION Screening using a sponge significantly improves MRSA detection when used in addition to screening with the standard nasal swab.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAxillaCarrier StateFemaleForeheadGroinHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedMolecular TypingNosePharynxPolymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID25627758
PMCPMC4467378
OpenAlexW2106037036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.