Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25627667›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2015

Correlates of perceived self-care activities and diabetes control among Dutch type 1 and type 2 diabetics.

Lieke G M Raaijmakers, Marloes K Martens, Charlotte Bagchus, Inge de Weerdt, Nanne K de Vries, Stef P J Kremers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adaptation and Validation of the Vietnamese Translated Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Diabetes self-management and glycemic control: The role of autonomy support from informal health supporters.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lieke G M RaaijmakersDepartment of Health Promotion, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands, lieke.raaijmakers@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Marloes K Martens
Charlotte Bagchus
Inge de Weerdt
Nanne K de Vries
Stef P J Kremers

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined how Dutch type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients' perceived autonomy support, as well as their perceived competence and treatment self-regulation, are associated with their diabetes self-care activities (healthy diet, physical activity, monitoring blood glucose, medication use) and general diabetes control. A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted among 143 type 1 diabetics and 384 type 2 diabetics. Overall, participants felt competent, supported in their autonomy, and perceived to autonomously self-regulate their diabetes. Our results underline the importance of perceived competence in type 1 and 2 diabetics, as this was strongly associated with adhering to a healthy diet and general diabetes control. Our findings also emphasize the need for autonomy supportive health care professionals in diabetes care. Interestingly, perceived competence partially mediated the influence of autonomy support on general diabetes control.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomySelf ConceptSocial SupportAdultAgedBlood GlucoseCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diet, DiabeticFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient ComplianceBlood Glucose

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.