Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25626921›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2015

Biocompatibility and characterization of a peptide amphiphile hydrogel for applications in peripheral nerve regeneration.

Katie A Black, Brian F Lin, Emily A Wonder, Seema S Desai, Eun Ji Chung, Bret D Ulery, Ravi S Katari, Matthew V Tirrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katie A Black1 Department of Bioengineering, University of California Berkeley , Berkeley, California.
Brian F Lin
Emily A Wonder
Seema S Desai
Eun Ji Chung
Bret D Ulery
Ravi S Katari
Matthew V Tirrell

Funding

Multimodal Peptide Amphiphile Micelles for AtherosclerosisR00HL124279 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CHUNG, EUN JI PAIGE · 2016 to 2018
$747k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve injury is a debilitating condition for which new bioengineering solutions are needed. Autografting, the gold standard in treatment, involves sacrifice of a healthy nerve and results in loss of sensation or function at the donor site. One alternative solution to autografting is to use a nerve guide conduit designed to physically guide the nerve as it regenerates across the injury gap. Such conduits are effective for short gap injuries, but fail to surpass autografting in long gap injuries. One strategy to enhance regeneration inside conduits in long gap injuries is to fill the guide conduits with a hydrogel to mimic the native extracellular matrix found in peripheral nerves. In this work, a peptide amphiphile (PA)-based hydrogel was optimized for peripheral nerve repair. Hydrogels consisting of the PA C16GSH were compared with a commercially available collagen gel. Schwann cells, a cell type important in the peripheral nerve regenerative cascade, were able to spread, proliferate, and migrate better on C16GSH gels in vitro when compared with cells seeded on collagen gels. Moreover, C16GSH gels were implanted subcutaneously in a murine model and were found to be biocompatible, degrade over time, and support angiogenesis without causing inflammation or a foreign body immune response. Taken together, these results help optimize and instruct the development of a new synthetic hydrogel as a luminal filler for conduit-mediated peripheral nerve repair.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibody FormationBiocompatible MaterialsCattleCell MovementCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCollagenFemaleGelsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMaterials TestingMechanical PhenomenaMice, Inbred BALB CNerve RegenerationPeptidesBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenGelsHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylatePeptidesSurface-Active Agents

Identifiers

PMID25626921
PMCPMC4394881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.