ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2015
Antineoplastic drug contamination in the urine of Canadian healthcare workers.
Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs in Occupational Settings: A Systematic Review of Biological Monitoring Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of chromosomal aberrations as a biomarker of exposure in healthcare workers occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs.Mutation research. Reviews in mutation researchPooled it
- Application of an innovative high-throughput liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous analysis of 18 hazardous drugs to rule out accidental acute chemotherapy exposures in health care workers.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2020Trial
- Adoption of Closed-System Drug Transfer Devices: Effectiveness in Reducing Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Drugs and the Change Management Process.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2025Article
- Characterization of education, technical practices and attitudes of Portuguese pharmacy technicians towards manipulation of cytotoxic drugs.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2024Article
- An Automated Micro Solid-Phase Extraction (μSPE) Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Method for Cyclophosphamide and Iphosphamide: Biological Monitoring in Antineoplastic Drug (AD) Occupational Exposure.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Occupational Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs in Twelve French Health Care Setting: Biological Monitoring and Surface Contamination.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The impact of training chemotherapy safety standards with a smartphone application on the knowledge, attitude, and performance of nurses.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Application of MIL-53(Al)-NHACS omega · 2022Article
- Nurses' internal contamination by antineoplastic drugs in hospital centers: a cross-sectional descriptive study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021Observational
- Evaluating Six Commercially Available Closed-System Drug-Transfer Devices Against NIOSH's 2015 Draft Vapor Protocol.Hospital pharmacy · 2020Article
- Environmental Contamination and Occupational Exposure of Algerian Hospital Workers.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Nursing Assistants' Use of Personal Protective Equipment Regarding Contact With Excreta Contaminated With Antineoplastic Drugs.Oncology nursing forum · 2019Article
- CE: Original Research: Antineoplastic Drug Administration by Pregnant and Nonpregnant Nurses: An Exploration of the Use of Protective Gloves and Gowns.The American journal of nursing · 2019Article
- A review of high performance liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric urinary methods for anticancer drug exposure of health care workers.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2017Review
- Liquid release as a source of potential drug exposure during the handling of intravenous infusions in nursing.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2017Article
- Biological Monitoring of 4 Antineoplastic Drugs in Health Care Workers from 2 Adult Hospitals: A Pilot Study.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacyArticle
- Doing the Dirty Work: Who Handles Antineoplastic Drug Contaminated Excreta and do They Do It Safely?Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingArticle
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to quantify the urine concentration of non-metabolized cyclophosphamide (CP), a commonly administered antineoplastic drug, among potentially exposed Canadian healthcare workers and to identify factors associated with the drug concentration levels.
methodsParticipants were asked to provide two sets of 24-h urine samples (at two different sampling events), and the level of CP was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. In addition to demographic information, participants were surveyed regarding their frequency of handling of antineoplastic drugs, safe drug handling training, and known contact with CP on their work shift. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed. A backward stepwise linear mixed effect model was conducted to identify the factors associated with urine concentration levels.
resultsWe collected 201 urine samples, and 55 % (n = 111) had levels greater than the LOD of 0.05 ng/mL. The mean urinary CP concentration was 0.156 ng/mL, the geometric mean was 0.067 ng/mL, the geometric standard deviation was 3.18, the 75th percentile was 0.129 ng/mL, and the range was <LOD to 2.37 ng/mL. All eight job categories evaluated had some urinary concentrations in excess of the LOD with unit clerks having the highest average level. Workers who worked in the drug administration unit, but were not responsible for administering the drugs to patients, i.e., volunteers, oncologists, ward aides, and dieticians, had the largest proportion of samples exceeding the LOD. We did not find any correlation between the urinary concentration levels and known contact with CP during the work shift. Two factors were found to be significantly associated with urinary CP concentration: (1) Workers who had a duty to handle antineoplastic drugs had higher concentration levels, and (2) workers who had not received safe drug handling training had higher levels of CP in their urine compared with those who had.
conclusionsThe presence of non-metabolized CP in urine confirms that, despite the existence of control measures, a broad range of healthcare workers are at risk of exposure to antineoplastic drugs. A review of the effectiveness of interventions to reduce exposure is warranted and should apply to all healthcare workers involved in some capacity with the hospital medication system. This study identified two factors that are related to the urine CP concentration levels which can serve as an impetus for reducing exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.