Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25626706›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2015

A mixed methods study of age at diagnosis and diagnostic odyssey for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Siaw H Wong, Belinda J McClaren, Alison Dalton Archibald, Alice Weeks, Tess Langmaid, Monique M Ryan, Andrew Kornberg, Sylvia A Metcalfe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Using mixed methods for genetic counseling research.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Diagnostic experiences of Duchenne families and their preferences for newborn screening: A mixed-methods study.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Micro-dystrophin Gene Therapy Partially Enhances Exercise Capacity in Older AdultMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siaw H WongMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Belinda J McClarenMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Alison Dalton ArchibaldMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Alice WeeksMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Tess LangmaidMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Monique M RyanMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Andrew KornbergMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sylvia A MetcalfeMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delayed diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) may be an ongoing problem internationally. We aimed to ascertain age at diagnosis and explore parents' experiences of the diagnosis of DMD in Australia. Using mixed methods, data were collected from laboratory and clinical record audits of testing for DMD in Victoria and Tasmania, interviews and a national survey of parents regarding their experiences from first noticing symptoms to receiving a diagnosis. The audits revealed that the median age at diagnosis for DMD was 5 years (n=49 during 2005-2010); this age had not changed substantially over this period. Fourteen parents interviewed reported age at diagnosis ranging from 2 to 8 years with a 6 month to 4 year delay between initial concerns about their child's development and receiving the DMD diagnosis. Sixty-two survey respondents reported the median age at diagnosis was 3 years and 9 months, while the median age when symptoms were noticed was 2 years and 9 months. Parents experienced many emotions in their search for a diagnosis and consulted with a wide range of health professionals. Half the survey respondents felt that their child could have been diagnosed earlier. Despite advances in testing technologies and increasing awareness of DMD, the age at diagnosis has remained constant in Australia. This mixed methods study shows that this diagnostic delay continues to have a negative impact on parents' experiences, places families at risk of having a second affected child and may have a deleterious effect on affected children's treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneParentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID25626706
PMCPMC4592094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.