ArticleJAMA2015
Moral concerns and the willingness to donate to a research biobank.
Article in JAMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic literature review of the 'commercialisation effect' on public attitudes towards biobank and genomic data repositories.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2024Pooled it
- A Review of Medical Data Sharing Initiatives With a Focus on the Use of Blockchain Technologies: Qualitative Comparative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Review
- Social and Behavioral Genomics: On the Ethics of the Research and Its Downstream Applications.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2025Review
- Towards a trusted genomics repository: Identifying commercialisation fears and preferred forms of governance across segments of the community.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2025Article
- Norwegian kidney biopsy biobank (NorKiBB): organization, baseline characteristics, and generalizability of a low-cost national biobank.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Commercialisation fears and preferred forms of governance: a mixed methods investigation to identify a trusted Australian genomics repository.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Public preferences towards data management and governance in Swiss biobanks: results from a nationwide survey.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Lessons Learned from the Pilot Phase of a Population-Wide Genomic Screening Program: Building the Base to Reach a Diverse Cohort of 100,000 Participants.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Comparison of factors influencing the willingness to donate biospecimens among guardians of children with cancer and adult cancer patients.Cancer medicine · 2022Article
- When Not to Ask: A Defense of Choice-Masking Nudges in Medical Research.Journal of health care law & policy · 2022Article
- A blank check or a global public good? A qualitative study of how ethics review committee members in Colombia weigh the risks and benefits of broad consent for data and sample sharing during a pandemic.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Social differentiation of the perception and human tissues donation for research purposes.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.Asian bioethics review · 2021Article
- Article
- Stem cell preservation for regenerative therapies: ethical and governance considerations for the health care sector.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2020Review
- Developing model biobanking consent language: what matters to prospective participants?BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Patient Perceptions and Familiarity With Medical Therapy for Heart Failure.JAMA cardiology · 2020Article
- Sources of Information and Beliefs About the Health Effects of Marijuana.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- Trust in genomic data sharing among members of the general public in the UK, USA, Canada and Australia.Human genetics · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.