Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25626036›Full record

SynthesisJAMA2015

Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review.

Natasha Bagdasarian, Krishna Rao, Preeti N Malani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05770726 (The Comparison of the Adjuvant Effect of Probiotics Between Delivery Via Colonoscopic Spray and Oral Administration in Patients With Clostridioides Difficile Colitis Receiving Vancomycin Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 211 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
211citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
40.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05770726 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Comparison of the Adjuvant Effect of Probiotics Between Delivery Via Colonoscopic Spray and Oral Administration in Patients With Clostridioides Difficile Colitis Receiving Vancomycin Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsDiarrhea InfectiousArmsProbiotics administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

211 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 446 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Laboratory Diagnostic Methods forAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Relationship BetweenOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Global burden and trends of theAnnals of medicine · 2025
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Biomedicines · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

151 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha BagdasarianDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Infection Control, St John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan2Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Krishna RaoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor4Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Preeti N MalaniDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor4Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Michigan Medicine · USSt. John Hospital & Medical Center · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
Research Education CoreP30AG024824 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Neil Alexander · 2004 to 2026
$29.2M
The Interplay Between Host Immunity and Clostridium difficile PathogenesisU19AI090871 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI YOUNG, VINCENT B · 2010 to 2014
$7.5M
NCATS NIH HHS 2UL1TR000433NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433NIAID NIH HHS 1U19AI090871-01NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090871NIA NIH HHS AG-024824NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024824
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceSince 2000, the incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have increased.

objectiveTo review current evidence regarding best practices for the diagnosis and treatment of CDI in adults (age ≥ 18 years). EVIDENCE REVIEW: Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched using keywords relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of CDI in adults. Articles published between January 1978 and October 31, 2014, were selected for inclusion based on targeted keyword searches, manual review of bibliographies, and whether the article was a guideline, systematic review, or meta-analysis published within the past 10 years. Of 4682 articles initially identified, 196 were selected for full review. Of these, the most pertinent 116 articles were included. Clinical trials, large observational studies, and more recently published articles were prioritized in the selection process.

findingsLaboratory testing cannot distinguish between asymptomatic colonization and symptomatic infection with C difficile. Diagnostic approaches are complex due to the availability of multiple testing strategies. Multistep algorithms using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the toxin gene(s) or single-step PCR on liquid stool samples have the best test performance characteristics (for multistep: sensitivity was 0.68-1.00 and specificity was 0.92-1.00; and for single step: sensitivity was 0.86-0.92 and specificity was 0.94-0.97). Vancomycin and metronidazole are first-line therapies for most patients, although treatment failures have been associated with metronidazole in severe or complicated cases of CDI. Recent data demonstrate clinical success rates of 66.3% for metronidazole vs 78.5% for vancomycin for severe CDI. Newer therapies show promising results, including fidaxomicin (similar clinical cure rates to vancomycin, with lower recurrence rates for fidaxomicin, 15.4% vs vancomycin, 25.3%; P = .005) and fecal microbiota transplantation (response rates of 83%-94% for recurrent CDI). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Diagnostic testing for CDI should be performed only in symptomatic patients. Treatment strategies should be based on disease severity, history of prior CDI, and the individual patient's risk of recurrence. Vancomycin is the treatment of choice for severe or complicated CDI, with or without adjunctive therapies. Metronidazole is appropriate for mild disease. Fidaxomicin is a therapeutic option for patients with recurrent CDI or a high risk of recurrence. Fecal microbiota transplantation is associated with symptom resolution of recurrent CDI but its role in primary and severe CDI is not established.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsClostridioides difficileEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousHumansAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID25626036
PMCPMC6561347
OpenAlexW2011542551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.