Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25625937›Full record

ReviewAccounts of chemical research2015

Markov state models provide insights into dynamic modulation of protein function.

Diwakar Shukla, Carlos X Hernández, Jeffrey K Weber, Vijay S Pande

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Accounts of chemical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic mechanism for subtype selectivity of endocannabinoids.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. De novo Folding Mechanisms of Lasso Peptides.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Assessing the Performance of BioEmu in Understanding Protein Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Hierarchical friction memory leads to subdiffusive configurational dynamics of fast-folding proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diwakar ShuklaDepartment of Chemistry, ‡Biophysics Program, and §SIMBIOS, NIH Center for Biomedical Computation, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Carlos X Hernández
Jeffrey K Weber
Vijay S Pande

Funding

Molecular Biophysics Training Program at StanfordT32GM008294 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, KERWYN C. · 1989 to 2019
$7.4M
Topology, nucleation, and the protein folding barrierR01GM062868 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PANDE, VIJAY S · 2002 to 2018
$5.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM062868NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008294NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM07297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

conspectusProtein function is inextricably linked to protein dynamics. As we move from a static structural picture to a dynamic ensemble view of protein structure and function, novel computational paradigms are required for observing and understanding conformational dynamics of proteins and its functional implications. In principle, molecular dynamics simulations can provide the time evolution of atomistic models of proteins, but the long time scales associated with functional dynamics make it difficult to observe rare dynamical transitions. The issue of extracting essential functional components of protein dynamics from noisy simulation data presents another set of challenges in obtaining an unbiased understanding of protein motions. Therefore, a methodology that provides a statistical framework for efficient sampling and a human-readable view of the key aspects of functional dynamics from data analysis is required. The Markov state model (MSM), which has recently become popular worldwide for studying protein dynamics, is an example of such a framework. In this Account, we review the use of Markov state models for efficient sampling of the hierarchy of time scales associated with protein dynamics, automatic identification of key conformational states, and the degrees of freedom associated with slow dynamical processes. Applications of MSMs for studying long time scale phenomena such as activation mechanisms of cellular signaling proteins has yielded novel insights into protein function. In particular, from MSMs built using large-scale simulations of GPCRs and kinases, we have shown that complex conformational changes in proteins can be described in terms of structural changes in key structural motifs or "molecular switches" within the protein, the transitions between functionally active and inactive states of proteins proceed via multiple pathways, and ligand or substrate binding modulates the flux through these pathways. Finally, MSMs also provide a theoretical toolbox for studying the effect of nonequilibrium perturbations on conformational dynamics. Considering that protein dynamics in vivo occur under nonequilibrium conditions, MSMs coupled with nonequilibrium statistical mechanics provide a way to connect cellular components to their functional environments. Nonequilibrium perturbations of protein folding MSMs reveal the presence of dynamically frozen glass-like states in their conformational landscape. These frozen states are also observed to be rich in β-sheets, which indicates their possible role in the nucleation of β-sheet rich aggregates such as those observed in amyloid-fibril formation. Finally, we describe how MSMs have been used to understand the dynamical behavior of intrinsically disordered proteins such as amyloid-β, human islet amyloid polypeptide, and p53. While certainly not a panacea for studying functional dynamics, MSMs provide a rigorous theoretical foundation for understanding complex entropically dominated processes and a convenient lens for viewing protein motions.

Indexed as

Markov ChainsModels, MolecularEntropyHumansIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProtein ConformationProteinsIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID25625937
PMCPMC4333613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.