Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25625326›Full record

ArticleStem cells and development2015

Cdx2 efficiently induces trophoblast stem-like cells in naïve, but not primed, pluripotent stem cells.

Stephanie Blij, Anthony Parenti, Neeloufar Tabatabai-Yazdi, Amy Ralston

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells and development, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Current strategies using 3D organoids to establishJournal of veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Generating Trophoblast Stem Cells from Human Naïve Pluripotent Stem Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Capturing and Interconverting Embryonic Cell Fates in a Dish.Current topics in developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie Blij1Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California.
Anthony Parenti2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Neeloufar Tabatabai-Yazdi1Department of Molecular, Cell, and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California.
Amy Ralston2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Training Program/Molecular/Cell/Developmental BiologyT32GM008646 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI STROME, SUSAN · 1999 to 2018
$3.7M
Molecular Regulation of Cell Fate in Stem Cells and Early Mouse EmbryosR01GM104009 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI RALSTON, AMY · 2013 to 2018
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104009NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM104009NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diverse pluripotent stem cell lines have been derived from the mouse, including embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), embryonal carcinoma cells (ECCs), and epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs). While all are pluripotent, these cell lines differ in terms of developmental origins, morphology, gene expression, and signaling, indicating that multiple pluripotent states exist. Whether and how the pluripotent state influences the cell line's developmental potential or the competence to respond to differentiation cues could help optimize directed differentiation protocols. To determine whether pluripotent stem cell lines differ in developmental potential, we compared the capacity of mouse ESCs, iPSCs, ECCs, and EpiSCs to form trophoblast. ESCs do not readily differentiate into trophoblast, but overexpression of the trophoblast-expressed transcription factor, CDX2, leads to efficient differentiation to trophoblast and to formation of trophoblast stem cells (TSCs) in the presence of fibroblast growth factor-4 (FGF4) and Heparin. Interestingly, we found that iPSCs and ECCs could both give rise to TSC-like cells following Cdx2 overexpression, suggesting that these cell lines are equivalent in developmental potential. By contrast, EpiSCs did not give rise to TSCs following Cdx2 overexpression, indicating that EpiSCs are no longer competent to respond to CDX2 by differentiating to trophoblast. In addition, we noted that culturing ESCs in conditions that promote naïve pluripotency improved the efficiency with which TSC-like cells could be derived. This work demonstrates that CDX2 efficiently induces trophoblast in more naïve than in primed pluripotent stem cells and that the pluripotent state can influence the developmental potential of stem cell lines.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsCDX2 Transcription FactorCell LineHomeodomain ProteinsInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceTranscription FactorsTrophoblastsCdx2 protein, mouseCDX2 Transcription FactorHomeodomain ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25625326
PMCPMC4440987
OpenAlexW2326584041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.