Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25625274›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2015

Nuclear osteopontin-c is a prognostic breast cancer marker.

K Zduniak, P Ziolkowski, C Ahlin, A Agrawal, S Agrawal, C Blomqvist, M-L Fjällskog, G F Weber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Periostin in Allergy and Inflammation.Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

K ZduniakDepartment of Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
P ZiolkowskiDepartment of Pathology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
C AhlinDepartment of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, SE-70185 Örebro, Sweden.
A AgrawalDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
S AgrawalDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
C BlomqvistDepartment of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden.
M-L FjällskogDepartment of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden.
G F WeberCollege of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
Wroclaw Medical University · PLÖrebro University Hospital · SEUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough Osteopontin has been known as a marker for cancer progression, the elevated production of this cytokine is not specific for cancer. We have identified the splice variant Osteopontin-c as being absent from healthy tissue but associated with about 75% of breast cancer cases. However, in previous studies of Osteopontin-c, follow-up information was not available.

methodsHere we have analysed 671 patients, comprising a cohort of 291 paraffin blocks plus a population-based case-control study of 380 arrayed breast tumor tissues.

resultsWe find that high staining intensity of nuclear Osteopontin-c is strongly associated with mortality in patients with early breast cancer. Cytosolic staining for exon 4, reflective of Osteopontin-a and -b also predicts poor outcome. By contrast, total Osteopontin does not correlate with prognosis. These diverse assessments of Osteopontin also do not correlate with each other, suggesting distinct expression patterns for the variant forms. Consistent with its role in tumor progression, not tumor initiation, Osteopontin-c is not correlated with proliferation markers (Ki-67, cyclin A, cyclin B, cyclin E and cyclin D), neither is it correlated with ER, PR or HER2.

conclusionsThe addition of Osteopontin-c immunohistochemistry to standard pathology work-ups may have prognostic benefit in early breast cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCase-Control StudiesCell NucleusEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedOsteopontinPolandPrognosisSurvivorsSwedenBiomarkers, TumorOsteopontin

Identifiers

PMID25625274
PMCPMC4333500
OpenAlexW1967144266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.