ArticleAnalytical chemistry2015
Node-pore sensing enables label-free surface-marker profiling of single cells.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Looking at endometriosis-diagnosis and disease mechanisms through a mechanical lens.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Integrated In-Plane Nanofluidic Devices for Resistive-Pulse Sensing.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2024Review
- Metal-pad-enhanced resistive pulse sensor reveals complex-valued Braess paradox.Physical review. E · 2023Article
- Multiplexed DNA-Directed Patterning of Antibodies for Applications in Cell Subpopulation Analysis.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2021Article
- Article
- Visco-Node-Pore Sensing: A Microfluidic Rheology Platform to Characterize Viscoelastic Properties of Epithelial Cells.iScience · 2019Article
- Developments in label-free microfluidic methods for single-cell analysis and sorting.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2019Review
- Node-Pore Coded Coincidence Correction: Coulter Counters, Code Design, and Sparse Deconvolution.IEEE sensors journal · 2018Article
- Lab-on-a-chip electrical multiplexing techniques for cellular and molecular biomarker detection.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Review
- Characterizing cellular mechanical phenotypes with mechano-node-pore sensing.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2018Article
- A hybrid resistive pulse-optical detection platform for microfluidic experiments.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Multiparametric Biomechanical and Biochemical Phenotypic Profiling of Single Cancer Cells Using an Elasticity Microcytometer.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2016Article
- Node-Pore Sensing for Characterizing Cells and Extracellular Vesicles.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Flow cytometry is a ubiquitous, multiparametric method for characterizing cellular populations. However, this method can grow increasingly complex with the number of proteins that need to be screened simultaneously: spectral emission overlap of fluorophores and the subsequent need for compensation, lengthy sample preparation, and multiple control tests that need to be performed separately must all be considered. These factors lead to increased costs, and consequently, flow cytometry is performed in core facilities with a dedicated technician operating the instrument. Here, we describe a low-cost, label-free microfluidic method that can determine the phenotypic profiles of single cells. Our method employs Node-Pore Sensing to measure the transit times of cells as they interact with a series of different antibodies, each corresponding to a specific cell-surface antigen, that have been functionalized in a single microfluidic channel. We demonstrate the capabilities of our method not only by screening two acute promyelocytic leukemia human cells lines (NB4 and AP-1060) for myeloid antigens, CD13, CD14, CD15, and CD33, simultaneously, but also by distinguishing a mixture of cells of similar size—AP-1060 and NALM-1—based on surface markers CD13 and HLA-DR. Furthermore, we show that our method can screen complex subpopulations in clinical samples: we successfully identified the blast population in primary human bone marrow samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia and screened these cells for CD13, CD34, and HLA-DR. We show that our label-free method is an affordable, highly sensitive, and user-friendly technology that has the potential to transform cellular screening at the benchside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.