Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25625043›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2015

Treatment patterns for ductal carcinoma in situ from 2000-2010 across six integrated health plans.

Heather Spencer Feigelson, Nikki M Carroll, Sheila Weinmann, Reina Haque, Chu-Ling Yu, Melissa G Butler, Beth Waitzfelder, Michelle G Wrenn, Angela Capra, Elizabeth A McGlynn and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03940248 (Phase II Study to Evaluate the Cosmetic Outcome of Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Early Stage Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03940248 phase2withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Study to Evaluate the Cosmetic Outcome of Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Early Stage Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CincinnatiRan2020 to 2021Enrolled0ConditionsBreast CancerArmsProton Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Trends in Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather Spencer FeigelsonInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO USA.
Nikki M CarrollInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO USA.
Sheila WeinmannCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR USA.
Reina HaqueKaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA USA.
Chu-Ling YuMid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Rockville, MD USA.
Melissa G ButlerKaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, GA USA.
Beth WaitzfelderCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii, Honolulu, HI USA.
Michelle G WrennInstitute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO USA.
Angela CapraKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA USA.
Elizabeth A McGlynnKaiser Permanente Center for Effectiveness and Safety Research, Pasadena, CA USA.
Laurel A HabelKaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA USA.
Kaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considerable debate exists about the optimal treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Using electronic data sources, we examined first course treatment patterns among women aged 18 years and older diagnosed with DCIS between 2000-2010 from six Kaiser Permanente (KP) regions. We calculated the proportion of patients receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS), BCS plus radiation therapy, unilateral mastectomy, bilateral mastectomy, and hormone therapy. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the association between patient characteristics and treatment. We included 9,437 women: 1,086 (11.5%) African-American; 1,455 (15.4%) Asian; 918 (9.7%) Hispanic; and 5,978 (63.3%) non-Hispanic white. Most cases (42.2%) received BCS plus radiation as their initial treatment. Nearly equal numbers of women received BCS without radiation (28.5%) or unilateral mastectomy (24.6%). Use of bilateral mastectomy was uncommon (4.7%), and most women (72.2%) did not receive hormone therapy has part of their first course treatment. We observed statistically significant differences in treatment patterns for DCIS by KP region and patient age. Predictably, nuclear grade and the presence of comorbidities were associated with first course treatment for DCIS. We observed statistically significant increases in BCS plus radiation therapy and bilateral mastectomy over time. Although still uncommon, the frequency of bilateral mastectomy increased from 2.7% in 2000 to 7.0% in 2010. We also observed differences in treatment by race/ethnicity. Our findings help illustrate the complex nature of DCIS treatment in the United States, and highlight the need for evidence based guidelines for DCIS care.

Indexed as

Breast cancerDuctal carcinoma in situMastectomyRaceTreatment

Identifiers

PMID25625043
PMCPMC4300310
OpenAlexW2099163810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.