Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25625041›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2015

Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst.

Ermanno Greco, Anil Biricik, Rocio P Cotarelo, Elisabetta Iammarone, Patrizia Rubino, Jan Tesarik, Francesco Fiorentino, Maria Giulia Minasi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02412605 (Effect of Trophectoderm Biopsy for Sex Selection on the Pregnancy and Miscarriage Rates of Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02412605 unknown statusnot on this map

Effect of Trophectoderm Biopsy for Sex Selection on the Pregnancy and Miscarriage Rates of Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI

TypeobservationalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2015Enrolled5,000ConditionsAssisted ReproductionArmsTrophectoderm embryo biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ermanno GrecoCentre for Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Anil BiricikGenoma, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Rome, Italy.
Rocio P CotareloCentre for Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta IammaroneCentre for Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Patrizia RubinoCentre for Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Jan TesarikMAR&Gen Clinic, Molecular Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Granada, Spain.
Francesco FiorentinoGenoma, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Rome, Italy.
Maria Giulia MinasiCentre for Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Rome, Italy.
European Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreimplantation genetic diagnosis and/or screening (PGD/PGS) allow the assessment of the genetic health of an embryo before transferring it into the uterus. These techniques require the removal of cellular material (polar bodies, blastomere(s) or trophectoderm cells) in order to perform the proper genetic analysis. We report the implantation and live birth outcome of a vitrified-warmed blastocyst developed after triple biopsy and double vitrification procedures at oocyte, cleavage embryo and blastocyst stage. CASE DESCRIPTION: An infertile couple, with family history of β-thalassemia, searched for IVF procedure and PGD. First polar bodies biopsy with subsequent vitrification was uninformative due to meiotic crossing-over, so oocytes were inseminated after warming. Two embryos were obtained and blastomere biopsy was performed on day 3 with inconclusive results on their genetic status. Their culture resulted in one expanded blastocyst stage on day 7 that underwent trophectoderm biopsy and vitrification. This embryo showed to be normal. It was then warmed and transferred in an artificial cycle. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: Preconception genetic analysis by removal and analysis of the first polar body is technically possible, but the genetic information that we can obtain at this stage may be limited and the oocytes to be inseminated is not predictable. Compared to blastomere biopsy, trophectoderm biopsy has more diagnostic efficiency with respect to both chromosomal mosaicism and PCR accuracy, reducing the problems of amplification failure and allele drop out. Moreover, embryos biopsied at the cleavage stage seem to have lower implantation rate than biopsied blastocyst.

conclusionsThis is the first case report of a live birth obtained from a three step biopsy and double vitrification procedures of a blastocyst. This case report seems also to suggest the harmlessness of all these procedures if carefully performed by a skilled biologist in an IVF lab with quality management system. Finally, our study highlight that blastocyst cryopreserved on day 7 have clinically important potential and embryos that not reach blastocyst stage on day 6 should not to be discharged because they may result in an ongoing pregnancy.

Indexed as

Blastocyst biopsyEmbryo biopsyPolar body biopsyVitrification

Identifiers

PMID25625041
PMCPMC4300308
OpenAlexW2129336951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.