ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015
Quantitative and qualitative comparison of continuous bed motion and traditional step and shoot PET/CT.
Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized, double-blind, crossover comparison of novel continuous bed motion versus traditional bed position whole-body PET/CT imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016Trial
- Continuous bed motion versus step-and-shoot acquisition in LAFOV PET/CT: insights from multi-phantom and patient studies.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Dynamic FDG PET/CT for differentiating focal pelvic uptake in patients with gynecological cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Improvement of motion artifacts using dynamic whole-bodyJapanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Four-dimensional quantitative analysis using FDG-PET in clinical oncology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Feasibility of whole-body 2-deoxy-2-[Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of cardiac image-derived input functions for quantitative whole body [Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Phantom-based acquisition time and image reconstruction parameter optimisation for oncologic FDG PET/CT examinations using a digital system.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- The effect of modern PET technology and techniques on the EANM paediatric dosage card.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Achievements of true whole-body imaging using a faster acquisition of the lower extremities in variable-speed continuous bed motion.Radiological physics and technology · 2021Article
- Comparison between dynamic whole-body FDG-PET and early-delayed imaging for the assessment of motion in focal uptake in colorectal area.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2021Article
- Dynamic whole-bodyEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
- Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020Article
- Comparison of Step-and-Shoot and Continuous-Bed-Motion PET Modes of Acquisition for Limited-View Organ Scans.Journal of nuclear medicine technology · 2017Article
- Whole-body dynamic imaging with continuous bed motion PET/CT.Nuclear medicine communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New developments in PET/CT technology have enabled the commercial availability of continuous bed motion (CBM) acquisition methods. This technology has some potential performance benefits compared to standard step and shoot (SS) imaging, however, this technology has not been assessed with regard to quantitative and image quality parameters compared to traditional SS techniques. This study seeks to compare clinically relevant quantitative and image quality parameters using CBM and SS data collection methods with the intent of providing assistance in making educated decisions regarding imaging protocol development when using CBM technology versus SS imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25625027PMC4299776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.