ArticleThe open AIDS journal2014
Recruitment of HIV-Positive Women in Research: Discussing Barriers, Facilitators, and Research Personnel's Knowledge.
Article in The open AIDS journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in the Employees' Health Cohort Study of Iran (EHCSIR): A Qualitative Content Analysis.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2026Article
- The 2000HIV study: Design, multi-omics methods and participant characteristics.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Recruitment characteristics and non-adherence associated factors of fibromyalgia patients in a randomized clinical trial: A retrospective survival analysis.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2021Article
- Design, analysis, and reporting of pilot studies in HIV: a systematic review and methodological study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2021Review
- Recruitment and Retention of Women Living With HIV for Clinical Research: A Review.AIDS and behavior · 2021Review
- Article
- Impact of dedicated women's outreach workers (WOWs) on recruitment of women in ACTG clinical studies.HIV research & clinical practice · 2021Article
- Screening and Enrollment by Sex in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Clinical Trials in the United States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020Article
- Article
- Assessing the Content Validity of a New Patient-Reported Measure of Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence for Electronic Administration in Routine HIV Care: Proposal for a Web-Based Delphi Study.JMIR research protocols · 2019Article
- Challenges in Recruiting African-Born, US-Based Participants for HIV and Tuberculosis Research.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2019Article
- γδ T cells: an immunotherapeutic approach for HIV cure strategies.JCI insight · 2018Article
- Follow YOUR Heart: development of an evidence-based campaign empowering older women with HIV to participate in a large-scale cardiovascular disease prevention trial.HIV clinical trials · 2017 · on this mapArticle
- From presumptive exclusion towards fair inclusion: perspectives on the involvement of women living with HIV in clinical trials, including stakeholders' views.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
- Women in HIV cure research: multilevel interventions to improve sex equity in recruitment.Journal of virus eradicationArticle
- HIV and women's health: Where are we now?Women's health (London, England)Article
- A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: The Community VOICES study.AJOB empirical bioethicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen have historically been under-represented in HIV research, partly due to ineffective recruitment strategies.
objectiveTo improve the existing understanding of recruitment for HIV-positive women based on a province-wide cross-sectional study.
methodsA survey was emailed to all site coordinators who recruited participants in a study involving 490 HIV-positive women living in Ontario, Canada. The survey consisted of questions regarding the important recruitment barriers and successes. Quantitative data were then contextualized within extensive knowledge from research personnel and team members.
resultsCompleted surveys were received from (89%) site coordinators (34/38) and 98% (31/34) were women. The highest ranked recruitment barriers identified were: sensitivity of the research topic (59%), time/availability constraints (59%), language barriers (53%), HIV disclosure/stigma issues (47%), lack of trust of research personnel (41%), fear of research (41%) and inaccessibility to child care and transportation (41%). The respondents felt that the most important personal attributes for recruitment were research personnel who were respectful (97%), skilled (91%), flexible (88%) and empathetic (88%) and had good communication skills (88%). The most successful recruitment strategies identified were: developing a strong rapport (88%) that was facilitated by an empathetic relationship (100%), acknowledging the sensitive nature of the research topic (94%), providing cash financial compensation (88%), and developing recruitment strategies unique to women (88%).
conclusionThere are differences in the approaches needed for the recruitment of HIV-positive women in research. For successful recruitment of HIV-positive women, a strong rapport between the research personnel and study participants is important. This rapport is facilitated by having study personnel who are respectful, trustworthy, empathetic, and flexible. Population-specific recruitment strategies are important to ensure adequate recruitment of minority groups in research with greater gender consideration for women requiring specific attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.