ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2014
Early hemodynamic response to the tilt test in patients with syncope.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemodynamic Response to the Head-Up Tilt Test in Patients With Syncope as a Predictor of the Test Outcome: A Meta-Analysis Approach.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Pooled it
- Assessing the efficacy of machine learning algorithms for syncope classification: A systematic review.MethodsX · 2024Review
- Classification of vasovagal syncope from physiological signals on tilt table testing.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
- Quantitative Complexity Theory (QCT) in Integrative Analysis of Cardiovascular Hemodynamic Response to Posture Change.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Quantitative Complexity Theory Used in the Prediction of Head-Up Tilt Testing Outcome.Cardiology research and practice · 2021Article
- Transfer Information Assessment in Diagnosis of Vasovagal Syncope Using Transfer Entropy.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- The complexity of hemodynamic response to the tilt test with and without nitroglycerine provocation in patients with vasovagal syncope.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Non-invasive evaluation of cardiac index by impedance cardiography in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2018Article
- The trigeminocardiac reflex - a comparison with the diving reflex in humans.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOur aim was to evaluate the differences in the early hemodynamic response to the tilt test (HUTT) in patients with and without syncope using impedance cardiography (ICG). MATERIAL AND
methodsOne hundred twenty-six patients (72 female/48 male; 37 ±17 years) were divided into a group with syncope (HUTT(+), n = 45 patients) and a group without syncope (HUTT(-), n = 81 patients). ECG and ICG signals were continuously recorded during the whole examination, allowing the calculation of heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output (CO) for every beat. The hemodynamic parameters (averaged over 1 min) were analyzed at the following points of the HUTT: the last minute of resting, the period immediately after the tilt (0 min), 1 min and 5 min after the maneuver. The absolute changes of HR, SV and CO were calculated for 0, 1, and 5 min after the maneuver in relation to the values at rest (ΔHR, ΔSV, ΔCO). Also, the percentage changes were calculated (HRi, SVi, COi).
resultsThere were no differences between the groups in absolute and percentage changes of hemodynamic parameters immediately after and 1 min after tilting. Significant differences between the HUTT(+) and HUTT(-) groups were observed in the 5(th) min of tilting: for ΔSV (-27.2 ±21.2 ml vs. -9.7 ±27.2 ml; p = 0.03), ΔCO (-1.78 ±1.62 l/min vs. -0.34 ±2.48 l/min; p = 0.032), COi (-30 ±28% vs. -0.2 ±58%; p = 0.034).
conclusionsIn the 5(th) min the decrease of hemodynamic parameters (ΔSV, ΔCO, COi) was significantly more pronounced in HUTT(+) patients in comparison to the HUTT(-) group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.