ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2014
Commentary on recent guidelines for treating hypertension.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lifestyle measures for treating hypertension.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2017Article
- Effect of ramipril/hydrochlorothiazide and ramipril/canrenone combination on atrial fibrillation recurrence in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with and without cardiac autonomic neuropathy.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2017Article
- What should the target blood pressure goals be?Archives of medical science : AMS · 2016Article
- The diagnostic value of supine blood pressure in hypertension.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2016Article
- Analysis of adverse events of sunitinib in patients treated for advanced renal cell carcinoma.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2016Article
- Update of treatment of heart failure with reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2016Article
- Lipids, blood pressure and kidney update 2015.Lipids in health and disease · 2015Review
- A retrospective study of antihypertensives in pemphigus: a still unchartered odyssey particularly between thiols, amides and phenols.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.