Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25624761›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2015

Nanoencapsulation of pomegranate bioactive compounds for breast cancer chemoprevention.

Amit B Shirode, Dhruba J Bharali, Sameera Nallanthighal, Justin K Coon, Shaker A Mousa, Ramune Reliene

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Puerarin inhibits EMT induced by oxaliplatinFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Pharmacological and Therapeutic Properties ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit B ShirodeDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA ; Cancer Research Center, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
Dhruba J BharaliPharmaceutical Research Institute, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, NY, USA.
Sameera NallanthighalDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA ; Cancer Research Center, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
Justin K CoonDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA ; Cancer Research Center, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
Shaker A MousaPharmaceutical Research Institute, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, NY, USA.
Ramune RelieneDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA ; Cancer Research Center, University at Albany, Rensselaer, NY, USA.
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pomegranate polyphenols are potent antioxidants and chemopreventive agents but have low bioavailability and a short half-life. For example, punicalagin (PU), the major polyphenol in pomegranates, is not absorbed in its intact form but is hydrolyzed to ellagic acid (EA) moieties and rapidly metabolized into short-lived metabolites of EA. We hypothesized that encapsulation of pomegranate polyphenols into biodegradable sustained release nanoparticles (NPs) may circumvent these limitations. We describe here the development, characterization, and bioactivity assessment of novel formulations of poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PLGA-PEG) NPs loaded with pomegranate extract (PE) or individual polyphenols such as PU or EA. Monodispersed, spherical 150-200 nm average diameter NPs were prepared by the double emulsion-solvent evaporation method. Uptake of Alexa Fluor-488-labeled NPs was evaluated in MCF-7 breast cancer cells over a 24-hour time course. Confocal fluorescent microscopy revealed that PLGA-PEG NPs were efficiently taken up, and the uptake reached the maximum at 24 hours. In addition, we examined the antiproliferative effects of PE-, PU-, and/or EA-loaded NPs in MCF-7 and Hs578T breast cancer cells. We found that PE, PU, and EA nanoprototypes had a 2- to 12-fold enhanced effect on cell growth inhibition compared to their free counterparts, while void NPs did not affect cell growth. PU-NPs were the most potent nanoprototype of pomegranates. Thus, PU may be the polyphenol of choice for further chemoprevention studies with pomegranate nanoprototypes. These data demonstrate that nanotechnology-enabled delivery of pomegranate polyphenols enhances their anticancer effects in breast cancer cells. Thus, pomegranate polyphenols are promising agents for nanochemoprevention of breast cancer.

Indexed as

Anticarcinogenic AgentsPlant ExtractsBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationFemaleHumansLythraceaeMCF-7 CellsNanocapsulesAnticarcinogenic AgentsNanocapsulesPlant Extractsellagic acidHs578T cellsMCF-7 cellsPLGA–PEG nanoparticlespomegranate extractpunicalagin

Identifiers

PMID25624761
PMCPMC4296962
OpenAlexW1982546793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.