Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25624758›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2015

Antibiotic and chemotherapeutic enhanced three-dimensional printer filaments and constructs for biomedical applications.

Jeffery A Weisman, James C Nicholson, Karthik Tappa, UdayaBhanu Jammalamadaka, Chester G Wilson, David K Mills

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Three-Dimensional Printing in Pediatric Orthopaedics: Cost Analysis and Emerging Applications.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffery A WeismanCenter for Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation Science, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, LA, USA.
James C NicholsonNanosystems Engineering, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, LA, USA.
Karthik TappaCenter for Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation Science, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, LA, USA.
UdayaBhanu JammalamadakaCenter for Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation Science, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, LA, USA.
Chester G WilsonNanosystems Engineering, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, LA, USA.
David K MillsCenter for Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation Science, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, LA, USA ; School of Biological Sciences, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, LA, USA.
Louisiana Tech University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing and additive manufacturing holds potential for highly personalized medicine, and its introduction into clinical medicine will have many implications for patient care. This paper demonstrates the first application of 3D printing as a method for the potential sustained delivery of antibiotic and chemotherapeutic drugs from constructs for patient treatment. Our design is focused on the on-demand production of anti-infective and chemotherapeutic filaments that can be used to create discs, beads, catheters, or any medical construct using a 3D printing system. The design parameters for this project were to create a system that could be modularly loaded with bioactive agents. All 3D-printed constructs were loaded with either gentamicin or methotrexate and were optimized for efficient and extended antibacterial and cancer growth-inhibiting cytostatic activity. Preliminary results demonstrate that combining gentamicin and methotrexate with polylactic acid forms a composite possessing a superior combination of strength, versatility, and enhanced drug delivery. Antibacterial effects and a reduction in proliferation of osteosarcoma cells were observed with all constructs, attesting to the technical and clinical viability of our composites. In this study, 3D constructs were loaded with gentamicin and methotrexate, but the method can be extended to many other drugs. This method could permit clinicians to provide customized and tailored treatment that allows patient-specific treatment of disease and has significant potential for use as a tunable drug delivery system with sustained-release capacity for an array of biomedical applications.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPrinting, Three-DimensionalBacteriaCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDrug Delivery SystemsGentamicinsHumansLactic AcidPolyestersPolymersAnti-Bacterial AgentsGentamicinsLactic AcidPolyesterspoly(lactide)Polymersantibacterialdrug deliverymedical devicepolymersthree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID25624758
PMCPMC4296964
OpenAlexW1991219412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.