Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25624516›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2015

Impact of the Diamond Light Source on research in Earth and environmental sciences: current work and future perspectives.

Ian T Burke, J Frederick W Mosselmans, Samuel Shaw, Caroline L Peacock, Liane G Benning, Victoria S Coker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Diamond Light Source: status and perspectives.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ian T BurkeEarth Surface Science Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK i.t.burke@see.leeds.ac.uk.
J Frederick W MosselmansDiamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, UK.
Samuel ShawSchool of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Caroline L PeacockEarth Surface Science Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Liane G BenningEarth Surface Science Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Victoria S CokerSchool of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diamond Light Source Ltd celebrated its 10th anniversary as a company in December 2012 and has now accepted user experiments for over 5 years. This paper describes the current facilities available at Diamond and future developments that enhance its capacities with respect to the Earth and environmental sciences. A review of relevant research conducted at Diamond thus far is provided. This highlights how synchrotron-based studies have brought about important advances in our understanding of the fundamental parameters controlling highly complex mineral-fluid-microbe interface reactions in the natural environment. This new knowledge not only enhances our understanding of global biogeochemical processes, but also provides the opportunity for interventions to be designed for environmental remediation and beneficial use.

Indexed as

chemical speciationenvironmental sciencemineralsnanomaterialspollutionsynchrotron

Identifiers

PMID25624516
PMCPMC4308981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.