Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25624511›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2015

Understanding the structural basis for controlling chromosome division.

David Barford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Taming the Beast: Control of APC/CCold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology · 2017
    Article
  3. Erratum to: Controlling the response to DNA damage by the APC/C-Cdh1.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2016
    Article
  4. Diamond Light Source: status and perspectives.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David BarfordDivision of Structural Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK dbarford@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council MC_UP_1201/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of chromosome division, termed mitosis, involves a complex sequence of events that is tightly controlled to ensure that the faithful segregation of duplicated chromosomes is coordinated with each cell division cycle. The large macromolecular complex responsible for regulating this process is the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C). In humans, the APC/C is assembled from 20 subunits derived from 15 different proteins. The APC/C functions to ubiquitinate cell cycle regulatory proteins, thereby targeting them for destruction by the proteasome. This review describes our research aimed at understanding the structure and mechanism of the APC/C. We have determined the crystal structures of individual subunits and subcomplexes that provide atomic models to interpret density maps of the whole complex derived from single particle cryo-electron microscopy. With this information, we are generating pseudo-atomic models of functional states of the APC/C that provide insights into its overall architecture and mechanisms of substrate recognition, catalysis and regulation by inhibitory complexes.

Indexed as

ChromosomesAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeAnimalsCell CycleCryoelectron MicroscopyCrystallography, X-RayDimerizationHumansMitosisProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProtein ConformationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSchizosaccharomycesUbiquitinationAnaphase-Promoting Complex-CyclosomeProteasome Endopeptidase Complexanaphase-promoting complex or cyclosomecell cyclechromosome division

Identifiers

PMID25624511
PMCPMC4308986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.