Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25624335›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2015

Characterization of mouse models of Mycobacterium avium complex infection and evaluation of drug combinations.

Claire Andréjak, Deepak V Almeida, Sandeep Tyagi, Paul J Converse, Nicole C Ammerman, Jacques H Grosset

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Virulence ofVeterinary medicine international · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efficacies of sequenced monotherapies ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Immunity AgainstVaccines · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. C3HeB/FeJ mice with chronicMycobacteria (London, England) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Assays for AssessingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in tuberculosis · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Claire AndréjakJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Unité INSERM U 1088, Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France Respiratory Disease Unit, University Hospital, Amiens, France clandrejak@gmail.com.
Deepak V AlmeidaJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, USA KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for Tuberculosis and HIV (K-RITH), Nelson R. Mandel School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Sandeep TyagiJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Paul J ConverseJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nicole C AmmermanJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, USA KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for Tuberculosis and HIV (K-RITH), Nelson R. Mandel School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Jacques H GrossetJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, USA KwaZulu-Natal Research Institute for Tuberculosis and HIV (K-RITH), Nelson R. Mandel School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS AI400007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mycobacterium avium complex is the most common cause of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease worldwide; yet, an optimal treatment regimen for M. avium complex infection has not been established. Clarithromycin is accepted as the cornerstone drug for treatment of M. avium lung disease; however, good model systems, especially animal models, are needed to evaluate the most effective companion drugs. We performed a series of experiments to evaluate and use different mouse models (comparing BALB/c, C57BL/6, nude, and beige mice) of M. avium infection and to assess the anti-M. avium activity of single and combination drug regimens, in vitro, ex vivo, and in mice. In vitro, clarithromycin and moxifloxacin were most active against M. avium, and no antagonism was observed between these two drugs. Nude mice were more susceptible to M. avium infection than the other mouse strains tested, but the impact of treatment was most clearly seen in M. avium-infected BALB/c mice. The combination of clarithromycin-ethambutol-rifampin was more effective in all infected mice than moxifloxacin-ethambutol-rifampin; the addition of moxifloxacin to the clarithromycin-containing regimen did not increase treatment efficacy. Clarithromycin-containing regimens are the most effective for M. avium infection; substitution of moxifloxacin for clarithromycin had a negative impact on treatment efficacy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsColony Count, MicrobialDrug CombinationsDrug SynergismFemaleLungMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMice, NudeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium avium ComplexMycobacterium avium-intracellulare InfectionSpecies SpecificityAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID25624335
PMCPMC4356827
OpenAlexW2132228218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.