Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25624319›Full record

ArticleBlood2015

An international consortium proposal of uniform response criteria for myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) in adults.

Michael R Savona, Luca Malcovati, Rami Komrokji, Ramon V Tiu, Tariq I Mughal, Attilio Orazi, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Eric Padron, Eric Solary, Raoul Tibes and 14 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 107 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02092324 phase2completednot on this map

Prospective Evaluation of Ruxolitinib Efficacy for CNL/aCML Patients With Mutation of CSF3R

TypeinterventionalSponsorOHSU Knight Cancer InstituteRan2014 to 2020Enrolled51ConditionsAtypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 Negative, Chronic Neutrophilic LeukemiaArmsLaboratory Biomarker Analysis, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration, Ruxolitinib Phosphate
NCT05641259 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of LP-108, a BCL-2 Inhibitor, Combined With Azacitidine In Subjects With AML, MDS, CMML

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuangzhou Lupeng Pharmaceutical Company LTD.Ran2023 to 2025Enrolled198ConditionsAcute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Chronic Myelomonocytic LeukemiaArmsLP-108, Azacitidine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. [Guideline of the diagnosis and treatment of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (2021)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2021
    Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Integrated Human and Murine Clinical Study Establishes Clinical Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia and Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 6 countries.

Michael R SavonaVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center/Vanderbilt University Medical Center, TN;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3763-5504
Luca MalcovatiUniversity of Pavia and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy;
Rami KomrokjiH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL;
Ramon V TiuCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH;
Tariq I MughalTufts University Medical Center, Boston, MA;
Attilio OraziWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY;
Jean-Jacques KiladjianHôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France;
Eric PadronH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL;
Eric SolaryInstitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France;
Raoul TibesMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ;
Raphael ItzyksonHôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France;
Mario CazzolaUniversity of Pavia and Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy;
Ruben MesaMayo Clinic Cancer Center, Scottsdale, AZ;
Jaroslaw MaciejewskiCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH;
Pierre FenauxHôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France;
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;
Aaron GerdsCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH;
Guillermo SanzHospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain;
Charlotte M NiemeyerUniversity of Freiburg, Germany;
Francisco CervantesThe August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;
Ulrich GermingUniversity of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; and.
Nicholas C P CrossUniversity of Southampton and Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Alan F ListH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL;
MDS/MPN International Working Group
Cleveland Clinic · USDélégation Paris 7 · FRUniversity of South Florida · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Pavia · ITCornell University · USHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTufts University · USUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Freiburg · DEVanderbilt University Medical Center · USWessex Regional Genetics Laboratory · GB

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are hematologically diverse stem cell malignancies sharing phenotypic features of both myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms. There are currently no standard treatment recommendations for most adult patients with MDS/MPN. To optimize efforts to improve the management and disease outcomes, it is essential to identify meaningful clinical and biologic end points and standardized response criteria for clinical trials. The dual dysplastic and proliferative features in these stem cell malignancies define their uniqueness and challenges. We propose response assessment guidelines to harmonize future clinical trials with the principal objective of establishing suitable treatment algorithms. An international panel comprising laboratory and clinical experts in MDS/MPN was established involving 3 independent academic MDS/MPN workshops (March 2013, December 2013, and June 2014). These recommendations are the result of this collaborative project sponsored by the MDS Foundation.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell ProliferationClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionHematologic NeoplasmsHematologyHumansInternational CooperationMedical OncologyMutationMyelodysplastic SyndromesMyeloproliferative DisordersPhenotypePractice Guidelines as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25624319
PMCPMC4915792
OpenAlexW2038795176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.