Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25624277›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2015

The CPRD and the RCGP: building on research success by enhancing benefits for patients and practices.

Antonis A Kousoulis, Imran Rafi, Simon de Lusignan

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre Annual Report 2014-2015: disparities in presentations to primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Who Owns the Data? Open Data for Healthcare.Frontiers in public health · 2016
    Review
  18. Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).International journal of epidemiology · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Antonis A KousoulisClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London.
Imran RafiClinical Innovation and Research, Royal College of General Practitioners, London.
Simon de LusignanPrimary Care & Clinical Informatics, University of Surrey, Guildford.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Public HealthBiomedical ResearchHumansPrimary Health CareUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID25624277
PMCPMC4325440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.