Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25624100›Full record

ArticleNature2015

Lagging-strand replication shapes the mutational landscape of the genome.

Martin A M Reijns, Harriet Kemp, James Ding, Sophie Marion de Procé, Andrew P Jackson, Martin S Taylor

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 252 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ribonucleotide errors, RNase HII, and ribonucleotide excision repair.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ADAR1 is an editor of DNA replication forks.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DNA polymerase α-primase can function as a translesion DNA polymerase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin A M Reijns *MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Harriet Kemp *MRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK.
James DingMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Sophie Marion de ProcéMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew P JacksonMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Martin S TaylorMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBMRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127580972Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127597124Medical Research Council MC_U127597124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of mutations is central to understanding evolution and of key relevance to health. Variation occurs non-randomly across the genome, and mechanisms for this remain to be defined. Here we report that the 5' ends of Okazaki fragments have significantly increased levels of nucleotide substitution, indicating a replicative origin for such mutations. Using a novel method, emRiboSeq, we map the genome-wide contribution of polymerases, and show that despite Okazaki fragment processing, DNA synthesized by error-prone polymerase-α (Pol-α) is retained in vivo, comprising approximately 1.5% of the mature genome. We propose that DNA-binding proteins that rapidly re-associate post-replication act as partial barriers to Pol-δ-mediated displacement of Pol-α-synthesized DNA, resulting in incorporation of such Pol-α tracts and increased mutation rates at specific sites. We observe a mutational cost to chromatin and regulatory protein binding, resulting in mutation hotspots at regulatory elements, with signatures of this process detectable in both yeast and humans.

Indexed as

Binding SitesChromatinConserved SequenceDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase IDNA Polymerase IIIDNA ReplicationEvolution, MolecularGenome, HumanHumansModels, BiologicalMutagenesisMutationProtein BindingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeChromatinDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Polymerase IDNA Polymerase IIIOkazaki fragmentsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25624100
PMCPMC4374164
OpenAlexW2066261076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.