ArticleArthritis care & research2015
Efficiency Gains for Rheumatology Consultation Using a Novel Electronic Referral System in a Safety-Net Health Setting.
Article in Arthritis care & research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Electronic consultations (E-consults) and their outcomes: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Pooled it
- Referral patterns, influencing factors, and satisfaction related to referrals of patients with rheumatic diseases to other healthcare professionals: an online survey of rheumatologists.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Factors affecting the successful implementation of the referral system: A scoping review.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021Article
- COVID-19: Effect on gastroenterology and hepatology service provision and training: Lessons learnt and planning for the future.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Identifying Content Themes in Primary Care Physician and Rheumatologist Communications Within Electronic Consultations: A Qualitative Study.ACR open rheumatology · 2021Article
- Managing patients using telerheumatology: Lessons from a pandemic.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2021Review
- Using Process Improvement and Systems Redesign to Improve Rheumatology Care Quality in a Safety Net Clinic.The Journal of rheumatology · 2020Article
- E-consults: an effective way to decrease clinic wait times in rheumatology.BMC rheumatology · 2020Article
- Blockchain-Enabled iWellChain Framework Integration With the National Medical Referral System: Development and Usability Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Electronic referral systems in health care: a scoping review.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2019Article
- A cohort study of a general surgery electronic consultation system: safety implications and impact on surgical yield.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Initial experience with endocrinology e-consults.Endocrine · 2017Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of the Safety Net Specialty Care Program in the Denver Metropolitan Area.The Permanente journal · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHealth information technology (HIT) holds promise in increasing access to rheumatologists by improving the quality and efficiency of referrals, but few studies have examined its use for this purpose. We evaluated the use and impact of a novel electronic referral (eReferral) system in rheumatology in a safety-net health system.
methodsWe examined eReferrals over 4 years. Our primary outcome was use of preconsultation exchange, defined as back-and-forth communication between referring and specialty care providers, facilitating triage of referrals, requests for more information, or resolution of questions without a visit. We calculated the proportion of eReferrals that underwent preconsultation exchange, time to reviewer response, and number of visits scheduled. To increase generalizability, we selected a random sample of eReferrals to undergo additional blinded, adjudicated review to assess agreement on appropriateness for preconsultation exchange.
resultsBetween 2008 and 2012, 2,383 eReferrals were reviewed and 2,105 were eligible for analysis. One-fourth of eReferrals were resolved without a clinic visit. The proportion of eReferrals undergoing preconsultation exchange increased over time (55% in 2008 versus 74% in 2011), and the volume of referrals also steadily increased over time. Reviewer response time averaged between 1 and 4 days. In the random sample of eReferrals that underwent adjudicated review, agreement between reviewers was high (κ = 0.72).
conclusionHIT-enabled preconsultation exchange was used for a majority of eReferrals and facilitated communication between referring clinicians and rheumatologists. This redesigned system of care allowed for triage of a high number of referrals, with many referrals determined to be appropriate for preconsultation exchange.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.