Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25623736›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

The FOCUS trial: cognitive remediation plus standard treatment versus standard treatment for patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Louise B Glenthøj, Birgitte Fagerlund, Lasse Randers, Carsten R Hjorthøj, Christina Wenneberg, Kristine Krakauer, Astrid Vosgerau, Christian Gluud, Alice Medalia, David L Roberts and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effectiveness of cognitive remediation in the ultra-high risk state for psychosis.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Louise B GlenthøjMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2400, Copenhagen, Denmark. louise.birkedal.glenthoej@regionh.dk.
Birgitte FagerlundCentre for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, DK-2600, Glostrup, Denmark. birgitte.fagerlund@regionh.dk.
Lasse RandersMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2400, Copenhagen, Denmark. lasse.randers@regionh.dk.
Carsten R HjorthøjMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2400, Copenhagen, Denmark. carsten.rygaard.hjorthoej@regionh.dk.
Christina WennebergMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2400, Copenhagen, Denmark. christina.wenneberg@regionh.dk.
Kristine KrakauerMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2400, Copenhagen, Denmark. kristine.krakauer@regionh.dk.
Astrid VosgerauMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2400, Copenhagen, Denmark. astrid.vosgerau@regionh.dk.
Christian GluudCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. cgluud@ctu.dk.
Alice MedaliaColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA. am2938@columbia.edu.
David L RobertsDepartment of Psychiatry, Division of Schizophrenia and Related Disorders, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA. robertsd5@uthscsa.edu.
Merete NordentoftMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, DK-2400, Copenhagen, Denmark. merete.nordentoft@dadlnet.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive deficits are a distinct feature among people at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis and pose a barrier to functional recovery. Insufficient evidence exists on how to ameliorate these cognitive deficits in patients at UHR for psychosis and hence improve daily living and quality of life. The aim of the trial is to investigate whether cognitive remediation can improve cognitive and psychosocial function in patients at UHR for psychosis.

methodsThe FOCUS trial (Function and Overall Cognition in Ultra-high risk States) is a randomised, parallel group, observer-blinded clinical trial enrolling 126 patients meeting the standardised criteria of being at UHR for psychosis. Patients are recruited from psychiatric in- and outpatient facilities in the Copenhagen catchment area. Patients are randomised to one of the two treatment arms: cognitive remediation plus standard treatment versus standard treatment. The cognitive remediation consists of 24 weekly group-based and manualised sessions targeting neurocognition and social cognition. In addition to the group sessions, the patients will be offered 12 individual sessions aiming at maximising the transfer of the effects of the cognitive training to their everyday lives. Follow-up assessments will be conducted at 6 and 12 months after randomisation. The primary outcome is the composite score on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia at cessation of treatment after 6 months. Secondary outcomes are social and daily functioning, psychosis-like symptoms, negative symptomatology, and depressive symptomatology as measured with the Personal and Social Performance Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded Version, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial to evaluate the effects of neurocognitive and social cognitive remediation in UHR patients. The FOCUS trial results will provide evidence on the effect of targeted and comprehensive cognitive rehabilitation on cognition, daily living, and symptomatology as well as long-term outcome in preventing transition to psychosis in UHR patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02098408 . Date of registration 18 March 2014.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsCognitionAdolescentAdultData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansPsychotic DisordersRiskSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID25623736
PMCPMC4318160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.