ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2015
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating if ChatGPT Can Answer Common Patient Questions Compared With OrthoInfo Regarding Rotator Cuff Tears.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
- Evaluating if ChatGPT Can Answer Common Patient Questions Compared to OrthoInfo Regarding Lateral Epicondylitis.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2025Article
- Articular Cartilage Injuries of the Knee: Patient Health Literacy, Expectations for Management, and Clinical Outcomes.Cartilage · 2021Review
- Letter to the Editor: Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' Online Patient Education Material Exceeds Average Patient Reading Level.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2015Article
- Lost in Translation: Preoperative Orthopaedic Education Materials Significantly Exceed Recommended Reading Levels.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.