Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25622696›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2015

Pharmacophore modeling using site-identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) with multiple probe molecules.

Wenbo Yu, Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju, E Prabhu Raman, Lei Fang, Alexander D MacKerell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Structural and thermodynamic framework for PIEZO1 modulation by small molecules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Biomolecular NMR assignments · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Computer-Aided Drug Design: An Update.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenbo YuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland , Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States.
Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju
E Prabhu Raman
Lei Fang
Alexander D MacKerell

Funding

Restoration of Tumor Suppression Activity in Malignant MelanomaR01CA107331 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WEBER, DAVID JOSEPH · 2006 to 2015
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA107331,NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptor-based pharmacophore modeling is an efficient computer-aided drug design technique that uses the structure of the target protein to identify novel leads. However, most methods consider protein flexibility and desolvation effects in a very approximate way, which may limit their use in practice. The Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) assisted pharmacophore modeling protocol (SILCS-Pharm) was introduced recently to address these issues, as SILCS naturally takes both protein flexibility and desolvation effects into account by using full molecular dynamics simulations to determine 3D maps of the functional group-affinity patterns on a target receptor. In the present work, the SILCS-Pharm protocol is extended to use a wider range of probe molecules including benzene, propane, methanol, formamide, acetaldehyde, methylammonium, acetate and water. This approach removes the previous ambiguity brought by using water as both the hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor probe molecule. The new SILCS-Pharm protocol is shown to yield improved screening results, as compared to the previous approach based on three target proteins. Further validation of the new protocol using five additional protein targets showed improved screening compared to those using common docking methods, further indicating improvements brought by the explicit inclusion of additional feature types associated with the wider collection of probe molecules in the SILCS simulations. The advantage of using complementary features and volume constraints, based on exclusion maps of the protein defined from the SILCS simulations, is presented. In addition, reranking using SILCS-based ligand grid free energies is shown to enhance the diversity of identified ligands for the majority of targets. These results suggest that the SILCS-Pharm protocol will be of utility in rational drug design.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug DesignHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHydrogen BondingLigandsModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular ProbesProteinsReceptors, DrugReproducibility of ResultsUser-Computer InterfaceWaterLigandsMolecular ProbesProteinsReceptors, DrugWater

Identifiers

PMID25622696
PMCPMC4339487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.