Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25622639›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Pilot study to evaluate a tailored text message intervention for pregnant smokers (MiQuit): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Sue Cooper, Katharine Foster, Felix Naughton, Jo Leonardi-Bee, Stephen Sutton, Michael Ussher, Matthew Leighton, Alan Montgomery, Steve Parrott, Tim Coleman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02043509 (Evaluation of a Tailored Text Message Intervention for Pregnant Smokers), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02043509 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of a Tailored Text Message Intervention for Pregnant Smokers (MiQuit): a Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2014 to 2015Enrolled407ConditionsPregnancy, SmokingArmsMiQuit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sue CooperDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. sue.cooper@nottingham.ac.uk.
Katharine FosterDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. kath.foster@nottingham.ac.uk.
Felix NaughtonDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. fmen2@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Jo Leonardi-BeeDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. jo.leonardi-bee@nottingham.ac.uk.
Stephen SuttonDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0SR, UK. srs34@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Michael UssherPopulation Health Research Institute, Hunter Wing, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK. mussher@sgul.ac.uk.
Matthew LeightonNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, C Floor, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. matthew.leighton@nottingham.ac.uk.
Alan MontgomeryNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners, C Floor, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. alan.montgomery@nottingham.ac.uk.
Steve ParrottDepartment of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK. steve.parrott@york.ac.uk.
Tim ColemanDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. tim.coleman@nottingham.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of Health RP-PG-0109-10020Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking in pregnancy is a public health problem. Self-help smoking cessation support can help pregnant women to stop smoking, but the effects of delivering this kind of support via SMS text message are not known. A previous randomised controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of providing such support to pregnant smokers using an automated, tailored text message intervention called MiQuit. This larger RCT will estimate key parameters for and will test the feasibility of delivering a major trial run within the United Kingdom National Health Service settings aimed at providing definitive evidence on the utility of MiQuit for helping pregnant smokers to stop. METHODS/

designThis will be a multi-centre, parallel group RCT. Participants are being identified in 16 English antenatal care settings and must be >16 years old, pregnant, <25 weeks gestation, smoke >1 daily cigarette, have smoked >5 daily cigarettes before pregnancy, and able to understand texts in English. After consenting and the collection of baseline data, participants are randomised to control or intervention groups in a 1:1 ratio; randomisation is stratified by trial site and gestation and employs computer-generated pseudo-random code using random permuted blocks of randomly varying size, and held on a secure server. All participants receive a National Health Service (NHS) leaflet aimed at helping them to stop smoking. Intervention group women also receive the 12-week MiQuit programme of tailored, supportive, interactive text message, self-help cessation support. Women are followed up by telephone 4 weeks after randomisation and at 36 weeks gestation. The study aims to recruit 400 women, and with this sample we will be able to estimate trial centres' recruitment rates to within +/-1% (margin of error = half width of 95% confidence interval); individual trial groups' ascertainment of rates for smoking outcomes between 4 weeks after randomisation until approximately 36 weeks gestation to within +/-4%, and across both groups, the combined cessation rate at 36 weeks +/-3%. DISCUSSION: Pilot trial completion will provide data to facilitate planning for a definitive trial investigating whether MiQuit works for smoking cessation in pregnancy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02043509 Registered 14 January 2014.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsText MessagingFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancySingle-Blind MethodSmoking CessationStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25622639
PMCPMC4318454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.