Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25622528›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Antihormonal agents as a strategy to improve the effect of chemo-radiation in cervical cancer: in vitro and in vivo study.

Mariana Segovia-Mendoza, Rafael Jurado, Roser Mir, Luis A Medina, Heriberto Prado-Garcia, Patricia Garcia-Lopez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. NMilitary Medical Research · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The role ofCancer management and research · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Synergic Effect ofOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana Segovia-MendozaInstituto Nacional de Cancerología, Subdirección de Investigación Básica, México D.F., 14080, México. monaco445@yahoo.com.mx.
Rafael JuradoInstituto Nacional de Cancerología, Subdirección de Investigación Básica, México D.F., 14080, México. fcojl@yahoo.com.
Roser MirInstituto Nacional de Cancerología, Subdirección de Investigación Básica, México D.F., 14080, México. rosermir83@gmail.com.
Luis A MedinaInstituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., 04510, México. medina@fisica.unam.mx.
Heriberto Prado-GarciaInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Departamento de Enfermedades Crónico-Degenerativas, México D.F, Mexico. hpradog@yahoo.com.
Patricia Garcia-LopezInstituto Nacional de Cancerología, Subdirección de Investigación Básica, México D.F., 14080, México. pgarcia_lopez@yahoo.com.mx.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXInstituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past few years, the concurrent use of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy has dramatically improved the local response and increased overall survival in early-stage cervical cancer. However, for the advanced stages of the disease this standard treatment has proved insufficient. We investigated the capacity of Mifepristone and ICI 182,780, which are anti-progestin and anti-estrogen drugs, respectively, to act as chemo-radiosensitizing agents in cervical cancer cells and cervix xenografts.

methodsThe effect of chemo-radiation alone or combined with Mifepristone or ICI 182,780 was evaluated in HeLa cells and with tumor growth in cervix xenografts. After concomitant chemo-radiotherapy, the effect of each of these antihormonal agents on apoptosis (determined by Annexing V assay) and the cell cycle phases were determined by flow cytometry. The expression of angiogenic factor VEGF in tumor samples was determined using quantitative RT-PCR analysis of VEGF gene expression.

resultsCompared to radiation alone or radiation/cisplatin therapy, there was significantly higher cytotoxicity and a greater antitumoral effect with the combined application of radiation/cisplatin and Mifepristone or ICI 182,780. Analyses of the apoptosis and cell cycle demonstrated changes only with ICI, not with Mifepristone, when was applied in combination with radiation/cisplatin. The analysis of VEGF mRNA expression levels in tumors at the end of the study demonstrated a significant inhibition, compared to radiation only or the radiation/cisplatin treatment, after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy and each one of the antihormonal drugs.

conclusionMifepristone and ICI 182,780 may be potentially promising chemo-radiosensitizing compounds to be used in combination with ionizing irradiation and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalApoptosisCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCisplatinDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGene ExpressionHeLa CellsHumansMiceTumor BurdenAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCisplatinVascular Endothelial Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID25622528
PMCPMC4311459
OpenAlexW2095959399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.