Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25622189›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of physical chemistry2015

Physical chemistry of nanomedicine: understanding the complex behaviors of nanoparticles in vivo.

Lucas A Lane, Ximei Qian, Andrew M Smith, Shuming Nie

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of physical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Ultrasmall-in-Nano: Why Size Matters.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Nanoswimmers Based on Capped Janus Nanospheres.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucas A LaneDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Chemistry, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30322; email: snie@emory.edu.
Ximei Qian
Andrew M Smith
Shuming Nie
Georgia Institute of Technology · USEmory University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Tissue and Animal UseU54CA119338 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIE, SHUMING · 2005 to 2009
$18.4M
Nanotechnology Linking Biomarkers with Cancer BehaviorR01CA108468 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIE, SHUMING · 2004 to 2008
$6.9M
Contrast-Enhanced and Image-Guided Surgery of Lung CancerR01CA163256 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JO, HANJOONG, SINGHAL, SUNIL · 2011 to 2015
$6.5M
Bioaffinity Nanoparticle Probes for Bioimaging (RMI)P20GM072069 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIE, SHUMING · 2004 to 2007
$2.6M
Nanotechnology for Multiplexed and Intraoperative Cancer DetectionRC2CA148265 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIE, SHUMING · 2009 to 2010
$2.0M
Next-Generation Quantum Dots for Molecular and Cellular Imaging of CancerR00CA153914 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI SMITH, ANDREW MICHAEL · 2012 to 2014
$709k
Tumor Targeting and Diagnostic Applications of Glycosylated NanotubesK99CA154006 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SINGH, RAVI N · 2010 to 2011
$257k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA154006NCI NIH HHS K99CA154006NCI NIH HHS R00 CA153914NCI NIH HHS R00CA153914NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108468NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163256NCI NIH HHS R01CA163256NCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148265NCI NIH HHS RC2CA148265NCI NIH HHS U54 CA119338NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201000043CNIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM072069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomedicine is an interdisciplinary field of research at the interface of science, engineering, and medicine, with broad clinical applications ranging from molecular imaging to medical diagnostics, targeted therapy, and image-guided surgery. Despite major advances during the past 20 years, there are still major fundamental and technical barriers that need to be understood and overcome. In particular, the complex behaviors of nanoparticles under physiological conditions are poorly understood, and detailed kinetic and thermodynamic principles are still not available to guide the rational design and development of nanoparticle agents. Here we discuss the interactions of nanoparticles with proteins, cells, tissues, and organs from a quantitative physical chemistry point of view. We also discuss insights and strategies on how to minimize nonspecific protein binding, how to design multistage and activatable nanostructures for improved drug delivery, and how to use the enhanced permeability and retention effect to deliver imaging agents for image-guided cancer surgery.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell MembraneDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMolecular ImagingNanomedicineNanoparticlesNanotechnologyNeoplasmsProteinsSurgery, Computer-AssistedProteinsactive targetingantifoulingfluorescent dyesimage-guided surgerymolecular imagingoncologypassive targeting

Identifiers

PMID25622189
PMCPMC8590374
OpenAlexW2138153808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.