Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25622095›Full record

Observational studyJAMA neurology2015

Factors associated with the onset and persistence of post-lumbar puncture headache.

Andrés E Monserrate, Davis C Ryman, Shengmei Ma, Chengjie Xiong, James M Noble, John M Ringman, John C Morris, Adrian Danek, Felix Müller-Sarnowski, David B Clifford and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predictors of post-lumbar puncture headache in an academic outpatient neurology setting: a retrospective exploratory study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Investigation of sex differences in mutation carriers of the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.

Andrés E MonserrateUniversity of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan2Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Davis C RymanDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri4Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Clinical Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Shengmei MaDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Chengjie XiongDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
James M NobleDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
John M RingmanMary S. Easton Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research at the University of California, Los Angeles.
John C MorrisDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri5Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Adrian DanekDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Munich, Germany.
Felix Müller-SarnowskiDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität Munich, Munich, Germany.
David B CliffordDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Eric M McDadeDepartment of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
William S BrooksNeuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
David G DarbyThe Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Colin L MastersThe Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Philip S J WestonSchool of Life and Medical Sciences,University College London, London, England.
Martin R FarlowIndiana Alzheimer Disease Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis.
Neill R Graff-RadfordDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Stephen P SallowayMemory and Aging Program, Butler Hospital, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island.
Anne M FaganDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Angela OliverDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri5Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Randall J BatemanDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network
Washington University in St. Louis · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEButler Hospital · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AUFoundation for Psychocultural Research · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USNeuroscience Research Australia · AUUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Puerto Rico System · PRWinnMed · US

Funding

Imaging CoreU19AG032438 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2010 to 2025
$53.9M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Imaging CoreU01AG032438 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS, DANIEL SCOTT · 2008 to 2009
$6.1M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesTL1TR000449 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/M003108/1NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000449NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032438NIA NIH HHS U19 AG032438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThis study assesses factors associated with the most common adverse event following lumbar puncture.

objectiveTo identify factors associated with the risk, onset, and persistence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe performed univariate and multivariable analyses of 338 lumbar punctures in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network observational study using linear mixed models, adjusting for participant-level and family-level random effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We directly evaluated associations of 3 post-lumbar puncture outcomes (immediate postprocedural headache, PDPH at 24-hour follow-up, and PDPH receiving a therapeutic blood patch) with participant age and sex, positioning, collection method, needle size, needle insertion site, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume collected.

resultsThe incidence of adverse events included 73 immediate postprocedural headaches (21.6%), 59 PDPHs at 24-hour follow-up (17.5%), and 15 PDPHs receiving a therapeutic blood patch (4.4%). Greater volume of CSF collected was associated with increased risk of immediate postprocedural headache, largely owing to a nonlinear increase in risk on collection of volumes above 30 mL (odds ratio, 3.73 for >30 mL and 0.98 for <17 mL). In contrast, collection of higher volumes showed a protective effect in decreasing rates of PDPH at 24-hour follow-up and rates of PDPH receiving a therapeutic blood patch (odds ratio, 0.35 per 10 mL). Although differences in needle size did not reach statistical significance, no participant in the 24G needle group received a therapeutic blood patch compared to 8 of 253 for the larger 22G needles. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Factors that acutely lower CSF pressure (eg, seated positioning or extracting very high volumes of CSF) may be associated with transient post-lumbar puncture headache, without increasing rates of persistent PDPH or therapeutic blood patch. Collection of up to 30 mL of CSF appears to be well tolerated and safe.

Indexed as

AdultBlood Patch, EpiduralFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPost-Dural Puncture HeadacheRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSpinal PunctureTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25622095
PMCPMC4364538
OpenAlexW2169611505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.