Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25621583›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2015

Metrical expectations from preceding prosody influence perception of lexical stress.

Meredith Brown, Anne Pier Salverda, Laura C Dilley, Michael K Tanenhaus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Word Recall is Affected by Surrounding Metrical Context.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meredith BrownDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester.
Anne Pier SalverdaDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester.
Laura C DilleyDepartment of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University.
Michael K TanenhausDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester.

Funding

COORDINATING INFORMATION IN SENTENCE PROCESSINGR01HD027206 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI TANENHAUS, MICHAEL KEHAS · 1991 to 2014
$4.0M
Time Course of Spoken Word RecognitionR01HD073890 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI TANENHAUS, MICHAEL KEHAS · 2012 to 2015
$989k
NICHD NIH HHS HD027206NICHD NIH HHS HD073890NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD027206NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two visual-world experiments tested the hypothesis that expectations based on preceding prosody influence the perception of suprasegmental cues to lexical stress. The results demonstrate that listeners' consideration of competing alternatives with different stress patterns (e.g., 'jury/gi'raffe) can be influenced by the fundamental frequency and syllable timing patterns across material preceding a target word. When preceding stressed syllables distal to the target word shared pitch and timing characteristics with the first syllable of the target word, pictures of alternatives with primary lexical stress on the first syllable (e.g., jury) initially attracted more looks than alternatives with unstressed initial syllables (e.g., giraffe). This effect was modulated when preceding unstressed syllables had pitch and timing characteristics similar to the initial syllable of the target word, with more looks to alternatives with unstressed initial syllables (e.g., giraffe) than to those with stressed initial syllables (e.g., jury). These findings suggest that expectations about the acoustic realization of upcoming speech include information about metrical organization and lexical stress and that these expectations constrain the initial interpretation of suprasegmental stress cues. These distal prosody effects implicate online probabilistic inferences about the sources of acoustic-phonetic variation during spoken-word recognition.

Indexed as

PhoneticsRecognition, PsychologySpeech PerceptionCuesHumansLanguageLinear Models

Identifiers

PMID25621583
PMCPMC4380594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.