Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25621426›Full record

ArticleThe Clinical journal of pain2015

Evaluation of Health Plan Interventions to Influence Chronic Opioid Therapy Prescribing.

Kathleen W Saunders, Susan Shortreed, Stephen Thielke, Judith A Turner, Linda LeResche, Randi Beck, Michael Von Korff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Clinical journal of pain, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Opioid Prescribing and Physician Autonomy: A Quality of Care Perspective.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathleen W SaundersGroup Health Research Institute.
Susan ShortreedGroup Health Research Institute.
Stephen ThielkeDepartments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Judith A TurnerDepartments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Linda LeRescheOral Medicine, University of Washington.
Randi BeckDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Group Health, Seattle, WA.
Michael Von KorffGroup Health Research Institute.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USGroup Health Cooperative · USPain and Rehabilitation Medicine · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Transition to Long-Term Opioid Use Among Older Adults with Chronic PainR01AG034181 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI VON KORFF, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034181Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute IHS-1306-02198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvaluate health plan interventions targeting physician chronic opioid therapy (COT) prescribing. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 2006, Group Health's (GH) Integrated Group Practice (IGP) initiated diverse interventions targeting COT prescriber norms and practices. In 2010, the IGP implemented a COT guideline, including a mandated online course for physicians managing COT. These interventions were not implemented in GH's network practices. We compared trends in GH-IGP and network practices for 2006 to 2012 in the percent of patients receiving COT and their opioid dose. We compared physician beliefs before versus after the mandated course and precourse to postcourse changes in COT dosing for IGP physicians who took the course.

resultsFrom 2006 to 2012, mean (SE) daily opioid dose among IGP COT patients (intervention setting) declined from 74.1 mg (1.9 mg) morphine equivalent dose (MED) to 48.3 mg (1.0 mg) MED. Dose changes among GH network COT patients (control setting) were modest-88.2 mg (5.0 mg) MED in 2006 to 75.7 mg (2.3 mg) MED in 2012. Among physicians taking the mandated course in 2011, we observed precourse to postcourse changes toward more conservative opioid prescribing beliefs. However, COT dosing trends did not change precourse to postcourse. DISCUSSION: Following initiatives implemented to alter physician prescribing practices and norms, mean opioid dose prescribed to COT patients declined more in intervention than control practices. Physicians reported more conservative beliefs regarding opioid prescribing immediately after completing an online course in 2011, but the course was not associated with additional reductions in mean daily opioid dose prescribed by physicians completing the course.

Identifiers

PMID25621426
PMCPMC4620063
OpenAlexW2318571619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.