Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25620996›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2015

Candidate gene-environment interaction research: reflections and recommendations.

Danielle M Dick, Arpana Agrawal, Matthew C Keller, Amy Adkins, Fazil Aliev, Scott Monroe, John K Hewitt, Kenneth S Kendler, Kenneth J Sher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
161citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

161 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Genetic susceptibility to respiratory health effects from outdoor air pollution: a structured narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Research Review: A review of the past decade of family and genomic studies on adolescent mental health.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Review

101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danielle M DickDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University ddick@vcu.edu.
Arpana AgrawalDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis.
Matthew C KellerInstitute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado Boulder.
Amy AdkinsDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Fazil AlievDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Scott MonroeDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame.
John K HewittDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis.
Kenneth S KendlerDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Kenneth J SherDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri.

Funding

Subject CollectionU10AA008401 · NIAAA · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI Yunlong Liu · 1989 to 2026
$162.7M
Twin StudyP60DA011015 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HEWITT, JOHN K. · 1997 to 2013
$22.5M
Estimating the genetic and environmental architecture of psychiatric disordersR01MH100141 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI KELLER, MATTHEW CHARLES · 2013 to 2022
$5.3M
Pathways to Alcohol Use Disorders in ALSPAC: A Genetic-Developmental StudyR01AA018333 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DICK, DANIELLE M, KENDLER, KENNETH SEEDMAN · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
CANNABIS AND TOBACCO INVOLVEMENT: A TWIN STUDYR01DA023668 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AGRAWAL, ARPANA · 2007 to 2016
$2.5M
Alcohol and Adult Development: Understanding Etiology and ConsequencesK05AA017242 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI SHER, KENNETH JAMES · 2007 to 2016
$2.1M
Twin, molecular, and developmental approaches to understanding alcohol misuseK02AA018755 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DICK, DANIELLE M · 2010 to 2019
$1.3M
DELINEATING THE ROLE OF GENETIC INFLUENCES ON CANNABIS INVOLVEMENTK02DA032573 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AGRAWAL, ARPANA · 2012 to 2021
$1.1M
Evolutionary Roles of Homozygosity & Copy Number Variation in Mental DisordersK01MH085812 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI KELLER, MATTHEW CHARLES · 2010 to 2014
$751k
AGE AT FIRST DRINK AND ALCOHOLISM: INTERSECTION OF GENES AND ENVIRONMENTR21AA021235 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI AGRAWAL, ARPANA · 2013 to 2014
$392k
NIAAA NIH HHS K02 AA018755NIAAA NIH HHS K02AA018755NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA017242NIAAA NIH HHS K05AA017242NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018333NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA018333NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018333-04S1NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA021235NIAAA NIH HHS R21AA21235NIAAA NIH HHS U10 AA008401NIAAA NIH HHS U10AA008401NIDA NIH HHS DA011015NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA032573NIDA NIH HHS K02DA32573NIDA NIH HHS P60 DA011015NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023668NIDA NIH HHS R01DA070312NIDA NIH HHS R01DA23668NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH085812NIMH NIH HHS K01MH085812NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100141NIMH NIH HHS R01MH100141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying how genetic predispositions come together with environmental factors to contribute to complex behavioral outcomes has great potential for advancing the understanding of the development of psychopathology. It represents a clear theoretical advance over studying these factors in isolation. However, research at the intersection of multiple fields creates many challenges. We review several reasons why the rapidly expanding candidate gene-environment interaction (cG×E) literature should be considered with a degree of caution. We discuss lessons learned about candidate gene main effects from the evolving genetics literature and how these inform the study of cG×E. We review the importance of the measurement of the gene and environment of interest in cG×E studies. We discuss statistical concerns with modeling cG×E that are frequently overlooked. Furthermore, we review other challenges that have likely contributed to the cG×E literature being difficult to interpret, including low power and publication bias. Many of these issues are similar to other concerns about research integrity (e.g., high false-positive rates) that have received increasing attention in the social sciences. We provide recommendations for rigorous research practices for cG×E studies that we believe will advance its potential to contribute more robustly to the understanding of complex behavioral phenotypes.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenetic ResearchResearch DesignAnimalsHumanscandidate genesG×Egene–environment interactiongenetics

Identifiers

PMID25620996
PMCPMC4302784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.