Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25620971›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2014

Metabolomics differentiation of canola genotypes: toward an understanding of canola allelochemicals.

M Asaduzzaman, James E Pratley, Min An, David J Luckett, Deirdre Lemerle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Application of plant-soil feedbacks in the selection of crop rotation sequences.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  4. Weed competitive ability in wheat: a peek through in its functional significance, present status and future prospects.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M AsaduzzamanSchool of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia ; Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
James E PratleySchool of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia ; Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Min AnGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia ; Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
David J LuckettGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia ; New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Deirdre LemerleSchool of Agricultural and Wine Sciences, Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia ; Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allelopathy is one crop attribute that could be incorporated in an integrated weed management system as a supplement to synthetic herbicides. However, the underlying principles of crop allelopathy and secondary metabolite production are still poorly understood including in canola. In this study, an allelopathic bioassay and a metabolomic analysis were conducted to compare three non-allelopathic and three allelopathic canola genotypes. Results from the laboratory bioassay showed that there were significant differences among canola genotypes in their ability to inhibit root and shoot growth of the receiver annual ryegrass; impacts ranged from 14% (cv. Atr-409) to 76% (cv. Pak85388-502) and 0% (cv. Atr-409) to 45% (cv. Pak85388-502) inhibition respectively. The root length of canola also differed significantly between genotypes, there being a non-significant negative interaction (r = -0.71; y = 0.303x + 21.33) between the root length of donor canola and of receiver annual ryegrass. Variation in chemical composition was detected between organs (root extracts, shoot extracts) and root exudates and also between canola genotypes. Root extracts contained more secondary metabolites than shoot extracts while fewer compounds were recorded in the root exudates. Individual compound assessments identified a total of 14 secondary metabolites which were identified from the six tested genotypes. However, only Pak85388-502 and Av-opal exuded sinapyl alcohol, p-hydroxybenzoic acid and 3,5,6,7,8-pentahydroxy flavones in agar growth medium, suggesting that the synergistic effect of these compounds playing a role for canola allelopathy against annual ryegrass in vitro.

Indexed as

Brassica napusLC-QTOF-MS and metabolomicsrapeseedroot exudatesweed

Identifiers

PMID25620971
PMCPMC4288380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.