ArticleFrontiers in psychology2014
Independent development of the Reach and the Grasp in spontaneous self-touching by human infants in the first 6 months.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- A cascading effects model of early sensory development in autism.Psychological review · 2026Review
- Catching small balls with a power grip and large balls with a precision grip: distinct roles for the reach and grasp.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- From Spontaneous Ignitions to Sensorimotor Cell Assemblies via Dopamine: A Spiking Neurocomputational Model of Infants' Hand Action Acquisition.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Automatic infant 2D pose estimation from videos: Comparing seven deep neural network methods.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Predictions of bimanual self-touch determine the temporal tuning of somatosensory perception.iScience · 2025Article
- Quantity of spontaneous touches to body and surface in very preterm and healthy term infants.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Protracted development of motor cortex constrains rich interpretations of infant cognition.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023Review
- Early exploration of one's own body, exploration of objects, and motor, language, and cognitive development relate dynamically across the first two years of life.Developmental psychology · 2022Article
- Making the World Behave: A New Embodied Account on Mobile Paradigm.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Development of Infant Reaching Strategies to Tactile Targets on the Face.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Learning and Acting in Peripersonal Space: Moving, Reaching, and Grasping.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2019Article
- Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy.The British journal of developmental psychology · 2018Article
- Touch the table before the target: contact with an underlying surface may assist the development of precise visually controlled reach and grasp movements in human infants.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
- Know Your Body Through Intrinsic Goals.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2018Article
- Fetal Origin of Sensorimotor Behavior.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2018Article
- A Naturalistic Observation of Spontaneous Touches to the Body and Environment in the First 2 Months of Life.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Synchrony of the Reach and the Grasp in pantomime reach-to-grasp.Experimental brain research · 2016Article
- Peripersonal Space and Margin of Safety around the Body: Learning Visuo-Tactile Associations in a Humanoid Robot with Artificial Skin.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Dual Visuomotor Channel Theory proposes that visually guided reaching is a composite of two movements, a Reach that advances the hand to contact the target and a Grasp that shapes the digits for target purchase. The theory is supported by biometric analyses of adult reaching, evolutionary contrasts, and differential developmental patterns for the Reach and the Grasp in visually guided reaching in human infants. The present ethological study asked whether there is evidence for a dissociated development for the Reach and the Grasp in nonvisual hand use in very early infancy. The study documents a rich array of spontaneous self-touching behavior in infants during the first 6 months of life and subjected the Reach movements to an analysis in relation to body target, contact type, and Grasp. Video recordings were made of resting alert infants biweekly from birth to 6 months. In younger infants, self-touching targets included the head and trunk. As infants aged, targets became more caudal and included the hips, then legs, and eventually the feet. In younger infants hand contact was mainly made with the dorsum of the hand, but as infants aged, contacts included palmar contacts and eventually grasp and manipulation contacts with the body and clothes. The relative incidence of caudal contacts and palmar contacts increased concurrently and were significantly correlated throughout the period of study. Developmental increases in self-grasping contacts occurred a few weeks after the increase in caudal and palmar contacts. The behavioral and temporal pattern of these spontaneous self-touching movements suggest that the Reach, in which the hand extends to make a palmar self-contact, and the Grasp, in which the digits close and make manipulatory movements, have partially independent developmental profiles. The results additionally suggest that self-touching behavior is an important developmental phase that allows the coordination of the Reach and the Grasp prior to and concurrent with their use under visual guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.