Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25620786›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2015

[Complications associated with plastic meshes and slings. A situation like in the US?].

E Petri

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 100% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in surgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

E PetriUrogynäkologie, Universitäts-Frauenklinik Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße 1, 17475, Greifswald, Deutschland, profpetri@gmx.de.
Universitäts Frauenklinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New surgical strategies have rarely been accepted so rapidly in clinical routine worldwide, without available prospective studies proving safety and efficacy. After the success of midurethral slings, having been implanted in millions of patients, alloplastic meshes are available for the treatment of prolapse with new, so far unknown complications in relevant frequency. In the USA with their own medicolegal system, there have been a flood of litigations (> 60,000 in 2014), with compensations of > USD 10 million in individual cases. Even though medical strategies and surgical skills might be different in Germany this development should encourage strict indications and centralization in pelvic floor centers.

Indexed as

HumansPelvic Organ ProlapseRisk AssessmentSuburethral SlingsSurgical MeshUrinary Incontinence, Stress

Identifiers

PMID25620786
OpenAlexW203375180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.