Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25620633›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2015

Cardiovascular hypertensive emergencies.

D P Papadopoulos, E A Sanidas, N A Viniou, V Gennimata, V Chantziara, I Barbetseas, T K Makris

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05110365 (Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Exercise on Blood Pressure and Ankle Brachial Index in Patient With Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05110365 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Exercise on Blood Pressure and Ankle Brachial Index in Patient With Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled24ConditionsHypertensionArmsProprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Malignant hypertension: does this still exist?Journal of human hypertension · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Treatment of hypertensive emergencies.Annals of translational medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D P PapadopoulosESH Excellent Center of Hypertension, Department of Cardiology, "Laiko" General Hospital, Athens, Greece, jimpapdoc@yahoo.com.
E A Sanidas
N A Viniou
V Gennimata
V Chantziara
I Barbetseas
T K Makris

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inevitably, a small proportion of patients with systematic hypertension will develop hypertensive crisis at some point. Hypertensive crises can be divided into hypertensive emergency or hypertensive urgency according to the presence or lack of acute target organ damage. In this review, we discuss cardiovascular hypertensive emergencies, including acute coronary syndrome, aortic dissection, congestive heart failure, and sympathomimetic hypertensive crises, including those caused by cocaine use. Each presents in a unique fashion, although some hypertensive emergency patients report nonspecific symptoms. Treatment includes several effective and rapid-acting medications to safely reduce the blood pressure, protect remaining end-organ function, relieve symptoms, minimize the risk of complications, and thereby improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood Pressure DeterminationCardiovascular DiseasesEmergency Medical ServicesHumansHypertensionAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.