Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25620512›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2015

Computational gene expression modeling identifies salivary biomarker analysis that predict oral feeding readiness in the newborn.

Jill L Maron, Jooyeon S Hwang, Subash Pathak, Robin Ruthazer, Ruby L Russell, Gil Alterovitz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimal Timing to Utilize Olfactory Stimulation with Maternal Breast Milk to Improve Oral Feeding Skills in the Premature Newborn.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  2. Oral colostrum priming shortens hospitalization without changing the immunomicrobial milieu.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. FOXP2 gene deletion and infant feeding difficulties: a case report.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2016
    Article
  17. Salivary FOXP2 expression and oral feeding success in premature infants.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2016
    Article
  18. The Neonatal Salivary Transcriptome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jill L MaronDivision of Newborn Medicine, Mother Infant Research Institute at Tufts Medical Center, Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA. Electronic address: jmaron@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.
Jooyeon S HwangDivision of Newborn Medicine, Mother Infant Research Institute at Tufts Medical Center, Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Subash PathakResearch Design Center/Biostatistics Research Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA.
Robin RuthazerResearch Design Center/Biostatistics Research Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA.
Ruby L RussellCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Gil AlterovitzCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Harvard University · USTufts Medical Center · USTufts University · US

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001064 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2013 to 2017
$26.4M
Neonatal Salivary Genomic Profiles To Access Feeding Tolerance and DiseaseK08HD059819 · NICHD · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MARON, JILL LAMANNA · 2009 to 2013
$617k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001064NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001064NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD059819NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD059819-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo combine mathematical modeling of salivary gene expression microarray data and systems biology annotation with reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction amplification to identify (phase I) and validate (phase II) salivary biomarker analysis for the prediction of oral feeding readiness in preterm infants. STUDY

designComparative whole-transcriptome microarray analysis from 12 preterm newborns pre- and postoral feeding success was used for computational modeling and systems biology analysis to identify potential salivary transcripts associated with oral feeding success (phase I). Selected gene expression biomarkers (15 from computational modeling; 6 evidence-based; and 3 reference) were evaluated by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction amplification on 400 salivary samples from successful (n = 200) and unsuccessful (n = 200) oral feeders (phase II). Genes, alone and in combination, were evaluated by a multivariate analysis controlling for sex and postconceptional age (PCA) to determine the probability that newborns achieved successful oral feeding.

resultsAdvancing PCA (P < .001) and female sex (P = .05) positively predicted an infant's ability to feed orally. A combination of 5 genes, neuropeptide Y2 receptor (hunger signaling), adneosine-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (energy homeostasis), plexin A1 (olfactory neurogenesis), nephronophthisis 4 (visual behavior), and wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 3 (facial development), in addition to PCA and sex, demonstrated good accuracy for determining feeding success (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.78).

conclusionsWe have identified objective and biologically relevant salivary biomarkers that noninvasively assess a newborn's developing brain, sensory, and facial development as they relate to oral feeding success. Understanding the mechanisms that underlie the development of oral feeding readiness through translational and computational methods may improve clinical decision making while decreasing morbidities and health care costs.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationFeeding BehaviorGene Expression RegulationMicroarray AnalysisModels, GeneticSucking BehaviorBiomarkersFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePredictive Value of TestsSalivaBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25620512
PMCPMC4306816
OpenAlexW2077164225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.