ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2015
Computational gene expression modeling identifies salivary biomarker analysis that predict oral feeding readiness in the newborn.
Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal Timing to Utilize Olfactory Stimulation with Maternal Breast Milk to Improve Oral Feeding Skills in the Premature Newborn.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2019Trial
- Oral colostrum priming shortens hospitalization without changing the immunomicrobial milieu.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017Trial
- An Exploratory Assessment of Early Feeding Modality and Associated Stomatognathic, Occlusal, and Language Outcomes in Preterm Children: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Developmental Differences in Circular RNA Expression Between Adult and Fetal Human Salivary Glands Based on Public Total RNA-Sequencing Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Short-Term Outcomes of Early Oral Colostrum Administration in VLBW Neonates: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- Salivary diagnostics: opportunities and challenges.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Spectral features of non-nutritive suck dynamics in extremely preterm infants.Pediatric medicine (Hong Kong, China) · 2023Article
- Role of forkhead box protein 2 (FOXP2) in oral-motor abilities of preterm infants: A brief literature review.Narra J · 2023Review
- The Utility of Speech-Language Biomarkers to Predict Oral Feeding Outcomes in the Premature Newborn.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Article
- Technical Considerations and Protocol Optimization for Neonatal Salivary Biomarker Discovery and Analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- Somatosensory Modulation of Salivary Gene Expression and Oral Feeding in Preterm Infants: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2017Article
- Development of a Rapid Salivary Proteomic Platform for Oral Feeding Readiness in the Preterm Newborn.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2017Article
- Salivary Diagnostics in Pediatrics: Applicability, Translatability, and Limitations.Frontiers in public health · 2017Review
- FOXP2 gene deletion and infant feeding difficulties: a case report.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2016Article
- Salivary FOXP2 expression and oral feeding success in premature infants.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2016Article
- The Neonatal Salivary Transcriptome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo combine mathematical modeling of salivary gene expression microarray data and systems biology annotation with reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction amplification to identify (phase I) and validate (phase II) salivary biomarker analysis for the prediction of oral feeding readiness in preterm infants. STUDY
designComparative whole-transcriptome microarray analysis from 12 preterm newborns pre- and postoral feeding success was used for computational modeling and systems biology analysis to identify potential salivary transcripts associated with oral feeding success (phase I). Selected gene expression biomarkers (15 from computational modeling; 6 evidence-based; and 3 reference) were evaluated by reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction amplification on 400 salivary samples from successful (n = 200) and unsuccessful (n = 200) oral feeders (phase II). Genes, alone and in combination, were evaluated by a multivariate analysis controlling for sex and postconceptional age (PCA) to determine the probability that newborns achieved successful oral feeding.
resultsAdvancing PCA (P < .001) and female sex (P = .05) positively predicted an infant's ability to feed orally. A combination of 5 genes, neuropeptide Y2 receptor (hunger signaling), adneosine-monophosphate-activated protein kinase (energy homeostasis), plexin A1 (olfactory neurogenesis), nephronophthisis 4 (visual behavior), and wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 3 (facial development), in addition to PCA and sex, demonstrated good accuracy for determining feeding success (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.78).
conclusionsWe have identified objective and biologically relevant salivary biomarkers that noninvasively assess a newborn's developing brain, sensory, and facial development as they relate to oral feeding success. Understanding the mechanisms that underlie the development of oral feeding readiness through translational and computational methods may improve clinical decision making while decreasing morbidities and health care costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.