Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25620471›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Uncertainty of prebiotic scenarios: the case of the non-enzymatic reverse tricarboxylic acid cycle.

Dmitry Yu Zubarev, Dmitrij Rappoport, Alán Aspuru-Guzik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Reactant Discovery with anACS earth & space chemistry · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A thermodynamic atlas of carbon redox chemical space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Prebiotic Reaction Networks in Water.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Reactivity of Metabolic Intermediates and Cofactor Stability under Model Early Earth Conditions.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Systems protobiology: origin of life in lipid catalytic networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  15. The Matter Simulation (R)evolution.ACS central science · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Exploring astrobiology usingPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dmitry Yu ZubarevDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Dmitrij RappoportDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Alán Aspuru-GuzikDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We consider the hypothesis of the primordial nature of the non-enzymatic reverse tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle and describe a modeling approach to quantify the uncertainty of this hypothesis due to the combinatorial aspect of the constituent chemical transformations. Our results suggest that a) rTCA cycle belongs to a degenerate optimum of auto-catalytic cycles, and b) the set of targets for investigations of the origin of the common metabolic core should be significantly extended.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCitric Acid CycleOrigin of LifeMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, TheoreticalQuantum Theory

Identifiers

PMID25620471
PMCPMC4306138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.