Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25620272›Full record

ArticleDepression and anxiety2015

Potentiated processing of negative feedback in depression is attenuated by anhedonia.

Erik M Mueller, Pia Pechtel, Andrew L Cohen, Samuel R Douglas, Diego A Pizzagalli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Depression and anxiety, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Invasive Computational Psychiatry.Biological psychiatry · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Blunted Neural Reward Responsiveness in Children with Recent Suicidal Ideation.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. A neurophysiological measure of reward sensitivity and its association with anhedonia in psychiatrically healthy adolescents and young adults.International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Erik M MuellerDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany; Center for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research & McLean Imaging Center, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts.
Pia Pechtel
Andrew L Cohen
Samuel R Douglas
Diego A Pizzagalli
McLean Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Neuroimaging Studies of Reward Processing in DepressionR01MH068376 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI PIZZAGALLI, DIEGO A · 2004 to 2014
$4.5M
Multi level Analysis of Positive Valence Systems Across Mood DisordersR01MH101521 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI PIZZAGALLI, DIEGO A · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068376NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough cognitive theories of depression have postulated enhanced processing of negatively valenced information, previous EEG studies have shown both increased and reduced sensitivity for negative performance feedback in MDD. To reconcile these paradoxical findings, it has been speculated that sensitivity for negative feedback is potentiated in moderate MDD, but reduced in highly anhedonic subjects. The goal of this study was to test this hypothesis by analyzing the feedback-related negativity (FRN), frontomedial theta power (FMT), and source-localized anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC) activity after negative feedback.

methodsFourteen unmedicated participants with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and 15 control participants performed a reinforcement learning task while 128-channel Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded. FRN, FMT, and LORETA source-localized aMCC activity after negative and positive feedback were compared between groups.

resultsThe MDD group showed higher FRN amplitudes and aMCC activation to negative feedback than controls. Moreover, aMCC activation to negative feedback was inversely related to self-reported anhedonia. In contrast, self-reported anxiety correlated with feedback-evoked frontomedial theta (FMT) within the depression group.

conclusionsThe present findings suggest that, among depressed and anxious individuals, enhanced processing of negative feedback occurs relatively early in the information processing stream. These results extend prior work and indicate that although moderate depression is associated with elevated sensitivity for negative feedback, high levels of anhedonia may attenuate this effect.

Indexed as

AdultAnhedoniaAnxietyCerebral CortexEmotionsEvoked PotentialsFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleTheta RhythmYoung Adultaction monitoringdepressionerror-related negativityfeedback-related negativity (FRN)LORETAtheta

Identifiers

PMID25620272
PMCPMC4374007
OpenAlexW1606167394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.