Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25620101›Full record

ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2015

Erythropoietin in stroke therapy: friend or foe.

Rhonda Souvenir, Desislava Doycheva, John H Zhang, Jiping Tang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of a Neuroprotective Erythropoietin Modified with a Novel Carrier for the Blood-Brain Barrier.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Circulating biomarkers in extremely preterm infants associated with ultrasound indicators of brain damage.European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society · 2018
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rhonda Souvenir
Desislava Doycheva
John H Zhang
Jiping TangDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology; School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350; USA. jtang@llu.edu.
Loma Linda University · US

Funding

Neurovascular Protection for Subarachnoid HemorrhageR01NS053407 · NINDS · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, JOHN H · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
Mechanisms of G-CSF-Induced NeuroprotectionR01NS060936 · NINDS · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI TANG, JIPING · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS NS053407NINDS NIH HHS NS060936NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS053407NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), over the past decade, was hailed as an auspicious therapeutic strategy for various types of brain injuries. The promising results from experiments conducted in animal models of stroke led to a hurried clinical trial that was swiftly aborted in Phase II. The multiple neuroprotective modalities of rhEPO failed to translate smoothly to human adult ischemic brain injury and provided limited aid to neonates. In light of the antithetical results, several questions were raised as to why and how this clinical trial failed. There was bolstering evidence from the preliminary studies that pointed to a bright future. Therefore, the objective of this review is to address these questions by discussing the signaling pathways of rhEPO that are reported to mediate the neuroprotective effect in various animal models of brain injury. Major biomedical bibliographical databases (MEDLINE, ISI, PubMed, and Cochrane Library) were searched with the use of keywords such as erythropoietin, stroke, neonatal hypoxia ischemia, intracerebral hemorrhage, etc. This article will discuss the confounding factors that influence the efficacy of rhEPO treatment hence challenging its clinical translatability. Lastly, rhEPO may still be a promising therapeutic candidate for neonates in spite of its shortcoming in clinical trial if caution is taken with the dose and duration of its administration.

Indexed as

ErythropoietinHumansRecombinant ProteinsSignal TransductionStrokeEPO protein, humanErythropoietinRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25620101
PMCPMC4497368
OpenAlexW2170209770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.