Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25620008›Full record

ArticleAdvances in genetics2015

Electroporation-mediated gene delivery.

Jennifer L Young, David A Dean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer L YoungDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
David A DeanDepartments of Pediatrics and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

Development of a gene therapy approach to treat acute lung injury using a preclinical, large animal modelR01HL131143 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEAN, DAVID A · 2016 to 2019
$3.0M
Cytoplasmic trafficking of non-viral gene therapy vectorsR01EB009903 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEAN, DAVID A · 2009 to 2017
$2.7M
VASCULAR SMOOTH MUSCLE SPECIFIC GENE THERAPY VECTORSR01HL059956 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA · PI DEAN, DAVID A · 1998 to 2007
$1.8M
DNA Nuclear Import Sequences for Cell-Specific Gene and Drug DeliveryR01GM094228 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEAN, DAVID A · 2010 to 2013
$1.7M
Cell-specific gene delivery methods for expression and silencing in the lungR01HL120521 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DEAN, DAVID A · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL059956NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120521NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131143NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009903NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroporation has been used extensively to transfer DNA to bacteria, yeast, and mammalian cells in culture for the past 30 years. Over this time, numerous advances have been made, from using fields to facilitate cell fusion, delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to cells and tissues, and most importantly, gene and drug delivery in living tissues from rodents to man. Electroporation uses electrical fields to transiently destabilize the membrane allowing the entry of normally impermeable macromolecules into the cytoplasm. Surprisingly, at the appropriate field strengths, the application of these fields to tissues results in little, if any, damage or trauma. Indeed, electroporation has even been used successfully in human trials for gene delivery for the treatment of tumors and for vaccine development. Electroporation can lead to between 100 and 1000-fold increases in gene delivery and expression and can also increase both the distribution of cells taking up and expressing the DNA as well as the absolute amount of gene product per cell (likely due to increased delivery of plasmids into each cell). Effective electroporation depends on electric field parameters, electrode design, the tissues and cells being targeted, and the plasmids that are being transferred themselves. Most importantly, there is no single combination of these variables that leads to greatest efficacy in every situation; optimization is required in every new setting. Electroporation-mediated in vivo gene delivery has proven highly effective in vaccine production, transgene expression, enzyme replacement, and control of a variety of cancers. Almost any tissue can be targeted with electroporation, including muscle, skin, heart, liver, lung, and vasculature. This chapter will provide an overview of the theory of electroporation for the delivery of DNA both in individual cells and in tissues and its application for in vivo gene delivery in a number of animal models.

Indexed as

ElectroporationGene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsBioreactorsHumansLiverMuscle, SkeletalVaccines, DNAWound HealingVaccines, DNAElectric fieldElectropermeabilizationElectroporationEndocytosisIntracellular traffickingPhysical methodsTransfectionVaccines

Identifiers

PMID25620008
PMCPMC6005385
OpenAlexW77671357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.