Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25619644›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists2015

Making quantitative morphological variation from basic developmental processes: Where are we? The case of the Drosophila wing.

Alexis Matamoro-Vidal, Isaac Salazar-Ciudad, David Houle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Engineering spatiotemporal organization and dynamics in synthetic cells.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  8. Why does allometry evolve so slowly?Integrative and comparative biology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The developmental-genetics of canalization.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  11. Coupling between dynamic 3D tissue architecture and BMP morphogen signaling duringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modularity: genes, development and evolution.Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexis Matamoro-VidalDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Isaac Salazar-CiudadGenomics, Bioinformatics and Evolution Group, Department de Genètica i Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
David HouleDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.

Funding

Building, understanding and applying a dictionary of genetic effectsR01GM094424 · NIGMS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DWORKIN, IAN MICHAEL, HOULE, DAVID · 2010 to 2013
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the aims of evolutionary developmental biology is to discover the developmental origins of morphological variation. The discipline has mainly focused on qualitative morphological differences (e.g., presence or absence of a structure) between species. Studies addressing subtle, quantitative variation are less common. The Drosophila wing is a model for the study of development and evolution, making it suitable to investigate the developmental mechanisms underlying the subtle quantitative morphological variation observed in nature. Previous reviews have focused on the processes involved in wing differentiation, patterning and growth. Here, we investigate what is known about how the wing achieves its final shape, and what variation in development is capable of generating the variation in wing shape observed in nature. Three major developmental stages need to be considered: larval development, pupariation, and pupal development. The major cellular processes involved in the determination of tissue size and shape are cell proliferation, cell death, oriented cell division and oriented cell intercalation. We review how variation in temporal and spatial distribution of growth and transcription factors affects these cellular mechanisms, which in turn affects wing shape. We then discuss which aspects of the wing morphological variation are predictable on the basis of these mechanisms. Developmental Dynamics 244:1058-1073, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

developmental systematicsDrosophila wing morphogenesisEvo-Devoevolutionary morphologyquantitative development

Identifiers

PMID25619644
PMCPMC4512935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.