Trial reportCancer medicine2015
Nab-paclitaxel-based compared to docetaxel-based induction chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Trial report in Cancer medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and platinum in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC: efficacy, safety, and survival predictive model.ESMO open · 2026Trial
- Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel and Nivolumab for PD-1 Inhibitor-Refractory Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous-Cell Carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2026Trial
- Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin in resectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a pilot phase II trial.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- nab-Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by concurrent cisplatin and radiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Oral oncology · 2016Trial
- Experimental Models and Nanotechnology-Based Platforms in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Tumor Biology to Translational Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- De-Escalation Strategies in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Regimens in Locally Advanced Squamous Head and Neck Cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Design, Conduct, and Analysis of Externally Controlled Trials.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- NAB-paclitaxel and cisplatin versus gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Oncologic outcomes following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy de-escalation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Efficacy, safety, and multi-omics analysis of pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and platinum as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A single-arm phase 2 study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024Article
- Induction Therapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Oncology and therapy · 2023Review
- nab-Paclitaxel-based induction chemotherapy followed by cisplatin and radiation therapy for human papillomavirus-unrelated head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2019Article
- Current Prospects of Molecular Therapeutics in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2019Review
- Role of nab-paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Nab-Paclitaxel in combination with Cisplatin Versus Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Correlation of Ki-67 Proliferative Antigen Expression and Tumor Response to Induction Chemotherapy Containing Cell Cycle-Specific Agents in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Head and neck pathology · 2017Article
- Clinical benefit of nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resistant to cremophor-based paclitaxel or docetaxel.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We previously reported that nab-paclitaxel-based induction chemotherapy (IC) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy resulted in low relapse rates (13%) and excellent survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We compare the disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) between patients given nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with cetuximab (APF-C) and historical controls given docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with cetuximab (TPF-C). Patients with locally advanced HNSCC were treated with APF-C (n = 30) or TPF-C (n = 38). After 3 cycles of IC, patients were scheduled to receive cisplatin concurrent with definitive radiotherapy. T and N classification and smoking history were similar between the two groups and within p16-positive and p16-negative subsets. The median duration of follow-up for living patients in the APF-C group was 43.5 (range: 30-58) months versus 52 (range: 13-84) months for TPF-C. The 2-year DSS for patients treated with APF-C was 96.7% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 85.2%, 99.8%] and with TPF-C was 77.6% (CI: 62.6%, 89.7%) (P = 0.0004). Disease progression that resulted in death was more frequent in the TPF-C group (39%) compared with the APF-C group (3%) when adjusted for competing risks of death from other causes (Gray's test, P = 0.0004). In p16 positive OPSCC, the 2-year DSS for APF-C was 100% and for TPF-C was 74.6% (CI: 47.4%, 94.6%) (P = 0.0019) and the 2-year OS for APF-C was 94.1% (CI: 65.0%, 99.2%) and for TPF-C was 74.6% (CI: 39.8%, 91.1%) (P = 0.013). In p16 negative HNSCC, the 2-year DSS for APF-C was 91.7% (CI: 67.6%, 99.6%) and for TPF-C was 82.6% (CI: 64.4%, 94.8%) (P = 0.092). A 2-year DSS and OS were significantly better with a nab-paclitaxel-based IC regimen (APF-C) compared to a docetaxel-based IC regimen (TPF-C) in p16-positive OPSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.