Trial reportJournal of veterinary internal medicine2015
Efficacy of gamithromycin for the treatment of foals with mild to moderate bronchopneumonia.
Trial report in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Tulathromycin for the Treatment of Foals with Mild to Moderate Bronchopneumonia.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2017Trial
- Use of Liposomal Gentamicin for Treatment of 5 Foals with Experimentally Induced Rhodococcus equi Pneumonia.Journal of veterinary internal medicineTrial
- Plasma C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 concentrations in foals during health and respiratory disease.Equine veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Is Rifampin (Rifampicin) Essential for the Treatment of Rhodococcus equi Infections in Foals? A Critical Review of the Role of Rifampin.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Comparative bactericidal activity of four macrolides alone and combined with rifampicin or doxycycline againstFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- A case-control study of atypical guttural pouch empyema in Arabian foals.Veterinary medicine and science · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial susceptibility of Rhodococcus equi strains isolated from foals in Chile.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Less Typical Courses ofVeterinary sciences · 2022Article
- Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): antimicrobial-resistantEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Equine Drug Transporters: A Mini-Review and Veterinary Perspective.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Current Trends in Understanding and Managing Equine Rhodococcosis.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGamithromycin is active in vitro against the bacterial agents most commonly associated with bronchopneumonia in older foals. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of this drug have not been investigated. HYPOTHESIS: Gamithromycin is effective for the treatment of bronchopneumonia in foals. ANIMALS: One hundred and twenty-one foals on a farm endemic for infections caused by Rhodococcus equi.
methodsIn a controlled, randomized, and double blinded clinical trial, foals with ultrasonographic evidence of pulmonary abscesses (abscess score 8.0-20 cm) were randomly allocated in 3 treatment groups: (1) gamithromycin IM q7 days (n = 40); (2) azithromycin with rifampin, PO q24h (n = 40); or (3) no antimicrobial treatment (controls; n = 41). Physical examination and thoracic ultrasonography were performed by individuals unaware of treatment group assignment. Foals that worsened were removed from the study.
resultsThe proportion of foals that recovered without the need to be removed from the study was significantly higher for foals treated with gamithromycin (38 of 40) or azithromycin with rifampin (39 of 40) than for controls (32 of 41). Treatment with gamithromycin or with azithromycin-rifampin resulted in a significantly faster decrease in the clinical score and abscess score compared to the controls. Adverse reactions characterized by colic (n = 18) and hind limb lameness (n = 14) were observed only in foals treated with gamithromycin. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Gamithromycin was noninferior to azithromycin with rifampin for the treatment of bronchopneumonia in the study population but had a higher frequency of adverse reactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.